• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Improvising – and Praying – on the Propers

Richard J. Clark · January 10, 2014

N RECENT YEARS, I HAVE ADOPTED THE HABIT of improvising on the propers when appropriate and applicable. Most often, this may be at a mass without choir, or perhaps one of the “off-peak” masses. This also comes in the form of the occasional prelude improvisation, usually on the Introit. In doing so, one can never be reminded enough of these words from the Second Vatican Council:

“In the Latin Church the pipe organ is to be held in high esteem, for it is the traditional instrument which adds a wonderful splendor to the Church’s ceremonies and powerfully lifts up man’s mind to God and to higher things.” (Sacrosanctum Concilium, 120),

Coupled with the above phrase must be the following:

“Therefore sacred music is to be considered the more holy in proportion as it is more closely connected with the liturgical action…” (Sacrosanctum Concillium § 112)

When one can print the text in a worship aid, the prayerful connection is easily made. However, when this is not the case, what purpose does it serve, and why persist in doing it? The answer is more closely related to the interior prayer life of the organist. Not only is a melody the subject of improvisation, but also the text must be in the heart of the improviser throughout!

To make a habit of carrying these texts in one’s heart on a regular basis can only be helpful to the prayer life of the organist. But what does this accomplish for anyone else? What does this accomplish liturgically? Well, a few things. First of all, a must read is Part Four of Dr. William Mahrt’s “The Musical Shape of the Liturgy: The Function of the Organ.” Dr. Marhrt points out the ancient common practice:

“The prescription found in medieval liturgical books that a melody which is to be carried by the organ is cantabitur in organis (it shall be sung upon the organ), or even dicetur in organis (it shall be said on the organ), and it acknowledges this function of implicitly bearing the text.”

However, this applies to well-known sacred melodies that a listener would easily recognize. The most common example are masses sung in alternatum with the organ. It is clearly understood what the text is whether sung or played.

But what about melodies that are unfamiliar, especially in a present-day context? Consider too, that the heart of improvisation is elaboration. Then what? Does anyone have any idea what we are doing? Is it important? Very few Offertory melodies are being whistled on the way out the door.

In such cases, one would not argue that the organ is speaking the text in the sense of ”dicetur in organis” (it shall be said on the organ). Rather, the music must serve to the heart of prayer in of itself, as well as serve the ongoing liturgical action, which improvisation tends to do fairly well.

CLOSE FRIEND, A PRIEST once told me years ago something I’ve never forgotten. “The people don’t need to know what it is to understand it.” In other words, they will understand the prayer interiorly if not in words. Since hearing that, I have always thought it important to play and pray music related to a relevant text. This is not an excuse for laziness and to not provide texts in worship aids. But in times when texts are not readily available, or even if they are, the liturgical understanding is not present, one relies on faith that what the musician prays edifies and transports those with open ears open to prayer.

Another friend recently wrote to me, “I don’t think that the average Catholic has a conscious appreciation of our need for sacred mystery.” However, I believe that there might be a subconscious hunger for the sacred mysteries. While this may sound silly to some of us, it is worth the reminder to never be afraid of expressing mystery. Improvisation does this quite well as it unleashes the spirit. Coupled with Gregorian Chant, improvisation gives further voice to the sacred. Do not be afraid of the mystery!

ERE I OFFER TWO somewhat random examples from the twenty-third Sunday in Ordinary Time. While crude videos, they were recorded during mass, hopefully retaining the continuity of the liturgical action. In somewhat of a colorful French, yet modal language, I hope my limited improvisational skills assist in prayer.

Hopefully, if we make a habit of keeping the prayers of the propers in our hearts, we will ourselves become converted and transformed in the ways we most need. This in turn may assist in all the other work that we must do.

There is power in improvisation and in prayer.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Improvisation, Pipe Organ, Propers Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Richard J. Clark

Richard J. Clark is the Director of Music of the Archdiocese of Boston and the Cathedral of the Holy Cross.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    PDF • “Music List” (Sunday, 28 December)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for Feast of the Holy Family of Jesus, Mary, & Joseph (28 Dec. 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. The FAUXBOURDON verses for the Communion Antiphon are particularly gorgeous. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are available at the feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF • “Music List” (Xmas Midnight Mass)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for Christmas Midnight Mass (“Ad Missam In Nocte”). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. The ENTRANCE CHANT is simple, but quite beautiful. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are available at the feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF • “Music List” (4th Sunday of Advent)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 21 December 2025, which is the 4th Sunday of Advent (Year A). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. The ENTRANCE CHANT is the famous “Roráte Coeli” and the fauxbourdon setting of the COMMUNION is exquisite. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are available at the feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    What does this mean? “Pre-Urbanite”
    One of the things informed critics have frequently praised vis-à-vis the Saint Jean de Brébeuf Hymnal has to do with its careful treatment of the ancient hymns vs. the “Urbanite” hymns. This topic I had believed to be fairly well understood—but I was wrong. The reason I thought people knew about it is simple; in the EDITIO VATICANA 1908 Graduale Romanum (as well as the 1913 Liber Antiphonarius) both versions are provided, right next to each other. You can see what I mean by examining this PDF file from the Roman Gradual of 1908. Most people still don’t understand that the Urbanite versions were never adopted by any priests or monks who sang the Divine Office each day. Switching would have required a massive amount of effort and money, because all the books would need to be changed.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • “Santo Santo Santo”
    Those searching for a dignified, brief, simple, bright setting of SANCTUS in Spanish (“Santo Santo Santo”) are invited to download this Setting in honor of Saint John Brébeuf (organist & vocalist). I wonder if there would be any interest in me recording a rehearsal video for this piece.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Pope Leo XIV on Sacred Music
    On 5 December 2025, Pope Leo XIV made this declaration with regard to liturgical music.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

Yet, with all its advantages, the new Missal was published as if it were a work put together by professors, not a phase in a continual growth process. Such a thing never happened before. It is absolutely contrary to the laws of liturgical growth, and it has resulted in the nonsensical notion that Trent and Pius V had “produced” a Missal four hundred years ago.

— Josef Cardinal Ratzinger (1986)

Recent Posts

  • “O Antiphons” Elevated?
  • PDF • “Music List” (Sunday, 28 December)
  • Should Catholics Sing Protestant Christmas Carols?
  • PDF • “Music List” (Xmas Midnight Mass)
  • What does this mean? “Pre-Urbanite”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.