• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

The Dawkins Delusion

Fr. David Friel · August 11, 2013

OU CAN TELL SOMETHING about the times in which you live by the people who are famous. It doesn’t tell you everything, but it tells you something. In our day, people like Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens have become household names. Most people have at least heard of them or seen them interviewed on TV. You may have even read a book by one of them. Hitchens is deceased now, but they both wrote a number of books. Dawkins’ most popular book, which is called The God Delusion, has sold million of copies in over 30 languages.

Both of these men are professed atheists who work in what they consider to be the cutting edge of science and evolution. The fundamental premise Dawkins uses in dismissing religion is this: he says that no one talks about “faith” when there is evidence at hand. For example, it doesn’t take faith to say that two and two are four or that the earth is round, because there’s empirical evidence for both. According to Dawkins, we only speak about faith when we want to substitute emotion in place of evidence. Just by looking at Dawkins and Hitchens, I think we can see that our modern age is filled with many attempts to belittle faith, as though we “sophisticated” people of the 21st century are somehow too grown up, too mature for a silly thing like faith.

When friends and coworkers question us about our faith, do we have a leg to stand on? Is there anything that can reasonably be said that might challenge an atheistic worldview? The Church throughout the world is still in the midst of celebrating the “Year of Faith,” so a quick look at the Scriptural definition of “faith” is appropriate. In the Letter to the Hebrews, we read that “faith is the realization of what is hoped for and evidence of things not seen” (Hebrews 11:1).

Faith, according to Scripture, is our evidence—the evidence Dawkins believes we substitute with mere emotion. When we are questioned about our faith, we shouldn’t be afraid. Faith and reason are not incompatible; in fact, they’re actually inseparable. We should be proud to profess our faith as Catholics, because we do, indeed, have a leg to stand on.

Just as one example, and perhaps most importantly, we should remember that the Blessed Mother, Mary Magdalene, and St. John all saw Jesus die on the cross. They were really standing right there. They were eye-level with the wounds in His feet. They watched Him die, and they carried Him to a tomb. Those same people, three days later, saw Him alive again. It was really Him, and He was alive enough to eat breakfast with them. And this was all written down, recorded for us in what we now call the Gospels. Ten of the original Twelve Apostles then gave their lives in defense of that Gospel. That’s all pretty empirical. There could be no greater proof of Jesus’ divinity than the Resurrection. And, if Jesus is divine, then everything else He said must be true, because God could never deceive. So we do have evidence, and that evidence is called faith.

This whole demand for evidence, though, is by its nature a bit bizarre. Since the so-called “Enlightenment” of the 17th & 18th centuries, many modern people have lived with an insatiable demand for evidence and proof. Everything is subjected to the verification principle: if I can’t hold it up and study it and prove it, it must not be true.

But what room does that leave for the great intangibles of life? Can anyone grab hold of love and prove it to somebody? Is it possible to subject joy to a scientific study? Can peace be put under a microscope? Of course not. But we profess our faith in God, Who is maker “of all things visible and invisible,” and it is these invisible realities that are the most important things of life! They may not be able to be verified, but it would be exceedingly rare to find someone who could deny the existence of things like justice & friendship & beauty.

There’s a certain irony in the modern age. On the one hand, we look to famous people like Dawkins and Hitchens and we see staunch atheism—the complete absence of faith. Then, on the other hand, we see people who are motivated by faith and inspired by the great things of life, like love & joy & peace. We look at famous people like Maximilian Kolbe and Edith Stein and Oscar Romero, and we see that there were more martyrs in the 20th century than ever before in the history of the Church. Martyrdom, after all, is the supreme act of loyalty to one’s faith. It is amazing that, in the same age, there are people who live on such different wavelengths.

We have the option to end up with the faithful or with the faithless. It is important to remember that faith is a gift. We can’t get faith by working hard. We can’t get it by studying a lot. Nor can we force it upon our friends or children. It is a supernatural gift that we either accept or reject. May we find strength in our faith as the “evidence of things not seen,” and may we remain true to it till death!

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Fr. David Friel

Ordained in 2011, Father Friel is a priest of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia and serves as Director of Liturgy at Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 21 September 2025) discusses some theological items—supported by certain verses in ancient Catholic hymns—and ends by explaining why certain folks become delirious with jealousy when they observe feats by Monsignor Ronald Knox.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
    It’s always amusing to see old diocesan newspapers—in huge capital letters—advertising the Cheapest Catholic Paper in the United States. The correspondent who sent this to me added: “I can think of certain composers, published by large companies in our own day, who could truthfully brag about the most tawdry compositions in the world!” I wonder what she could have meant by such a cryptic comment…
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies
    Along with so many others, I have deep respect for Dom Gregory Gregory Murray, who produced this clever harmonization (PDF) of “O SANCTISSIMA.” It’s always amazed me that Dom Gregory—a truly inspired composer—was so confused when it came to GREGORIAN CHANT. Throughout his life, he published contradictory statements, veering back-and-forth like a weather vane. Toward the end of his life, he declared: “I see clearly that the need for reform in liturgical music arose, not in the 18th and 19th centuries, but a thousand years earlier—in the 8th and 9th centuries, or even before that. The abuses began, not with Mozart and Haydn, but with those over-enthusiastic medieval musicians who developed the elaborate and flamboyant Gregorian Chant.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Karl Keating • “Canonization Questions”
    We were sent an internet statement (screenshot) that’s garnered significant attention, in which KARL KEATING (founder of Catholic Answers) speaks about whether canonizations are infallible. Mr. Keating seems unaware that canonizations are—in the final analysis—a theological opinion. They are not infallible, as explained in this 2014 article by a priest (with a doctorate in theology) who worked for multiple popes. Mr. Keating says: “I’m unaware of such claims arising from any quarter until several recent popes disliked by these Traditionalists were canonized, including John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II. Usually Paul VI receives the most opprobrium.” Mr. Keating is incorrect; e.g. Father John Vianney, several centuries ago, taught clearly that canonizations are not infallible. Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen would be another example, although clearly much more recent than Saint John Vianney.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Vatican II Changed Wedding Propers?
    It’s often claimed that the wedding propers were changed after Vatican II. As a matter of fact, that is a false claim. The EDITIO VATICANA propers (Introit: Deus Israel) remained the same after Vatican II. However, a new set of propers (Introit: Ecce Deus) was provided for optional use. The same holds true for the feast of Pope Saint Gregory the Great on 3 September: the 1943 propers (Introit: Si díligis me) were provided for optional use, but the traditional PROPRIA MISSAE (Introit: Sacerdótes Dei) were retained; they weren’t gotten rid of. The Ordo Cantus Missae (1970) makes this crystal clear, as does the Missal itself. There was an effort made in the post-conciliar years to eliminate so-called “Neo-Gregorian” chants, but (contrary to popular belief) most were retained: cf. the feast of Christ the King, the feast of the Immaculate Conception, and so forth.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Solemn “Salve Regina” (Chant)
    How many “S” words can you think of using alliteration? How about Schwann Solemn Salve Score? You can download the SOLEMN SALVE REGINA in Gregorian Chant. The notation follows the official rhythm (EDITIO VATICANA). Canon Jules Van Nuffel, choirmaster of the Cathedral of Saint Rumbold, composed this accompaniment for it (although some feel it isn’t his best work).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

In the Orthodox Churches they have kept that pristine liturgy, so beautiful. We have lost a bit the sense of adoration. They keep, they praise God, they adore God, they sing, time doesn’t count. God is the center, and this is a richness …

— Pope Francis (8/2/2013)

Recent Posts

  • New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
  • How do you pronounce this word in Latin?
  • Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
  • Children’s Repertoire: “3 Recommendations”
  • PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.