• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

The Dawkins Delusion

Fr. David Friel · August 11, 2013

OU CAN TELL SOMETHING about the times in which you live by the people who are famous. It doesn’t tell you everything, but it tells you something. In our day, people like Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens have become household names. Most people have at least heard of them or seen them interviewed on TV. You may have even read a book by one of them. Hitchens is deceased now, but they both wrote a number of books. Dawkins’ most popular book, which is called The God Delusion, has sold million of copies in over 30 languages.

Both of these men are professed atheists who work in what they consider to be the cutting edge of science and evolution. The fundamental premise Dawkins uses in dismissing religion is this: he says that no one talks about “faith” when there is evidence at hand. For example, it doesn’t take faith to say that two and two are four or that the earth is round, because there’s empirical evidence for both. According to Dawkins, we only speak about faith when we want to substitute emotion in place of evidence. Just by looking at Dawkins and Hitchens, I think we can see that our modern age is filled with many attempts to belittle faith, as though we “sophisticated” people of the 21st century are somehow too grown up, too mature for a silly thing like faith.

When friends and coworkers question us about our faith, do we have a leg to stand on? Is there anything that can reasonably be said that might challenge an atheistic worldview? The Church throughout the world is still in the midst of celebrating the “Year of Faith,” so a quick look at the Scriptural definition of “faith” is appropriate. In the Letter to the Hebrews, we read that “faith is the realization of what is hoped for and evidence of things not seen” (Hebrews 11:1).

Faith, according to Scripture, is our evidence—the evidence Dawkins believes we substitute with mere emotion. When we are questioned about our faith, we shouldn’t be afraid. Faith and reason are not incompatible; in fact, they’re actually inseparable. We should be proud to profess our faith as Catholics, because we do, indeed, have a leg to stand on.

Just as one example, and perhaps most importantly, we should remember that the Blessed Mother, Mary Magdalene, and St. John all saw Jesus die on the cross. They were really standing right there. They were eye-level with the wounds in His feet. They watched Him die, and they carried Him to a tomb. Those same people, three days later, saw Him alive again. It was really Him, and He was alive enough to eat breakfast with them. And this was all written down, recorded for us in what we now call the Gospels. Ten of the original Twelve Apostles then gave their lives in defense of that Gospel. That’s all pretty empirical. There could be no greater proof of Jesus’ divinity than the Resurrection. And, if Jesus is divine, then everything else He said must be true, because God could never deceive. So we do have evidence, and that evidence is called faith.

This whole demand for evidence, though, is by its nature a bit bizarre. Since the so-called “Enlightenment” of the 17th & 18th centuries, many modern people have lived with an insatiable demand for evidence and proof. Everything is subjected to the verification principle: if I can’t hold it up and study it and prove it, it must not be true.

But what room does that leave for the great intangibles of life? Can anyone grab hold of love and prove it to somebody? Is it possible to subject joy to a scientific study? Can peace be put under a microscope? Of course not. But we profess our faith in God, Who is maker “of all things visible and invisible,” and it is these invisible realities that are the most important things of life! They may not be able to be verified, but it would be exceedingly rare to find someone who could deny the existence of things like justice & friendship & beauty.

There’s a certain irony in the modern age. On the one hand, we look to famous people like Dawkins and Hitchens and we see staunch atheism—the complete absence of faith. Then, on the other hand, we see people who are motivated by faith and inspired by the great things of life, like love & joy & peace. We look at famous people like Maximilian Kolbe and Edith Stein and Oscar Romero, and we see that there were more martyrs in the 20th century than ever before in the history of the Church. Martyrdom, after all, is the supreme act of loyalty to one’s faith. It is amazing that, in the same age, there are people who live on such different wavelengths.

We have the option to end up with the faithful or with the faithless. It is important to remember that faith is a gift. We can’t get faith by working hard. We can’t get it by studying a lot. Nor can we force it upon our friends or children. It is a supernatural gift that we either accept or reject. May we find strength in our faith as the “evidence of things not seen,” and may we remain true to it till death!

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Fr. David Friel

Ordained in 2011, Father Friel is a priest of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia and serves as Director of Liturgy at Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    “Offertory” at Catholic Funerals
    I have argued that the OFFERTORY—at least in its ancient form—is more of a responsory than an antiphon. The 1962 Missal specifically calls it “Antiphona ad Offertorium.” From now on, I plan to use this beautiful setting (PDF) at funerals, since it cleverly inserts themes from the absolution of the body. Tons more research needs to be done on the OFFERTORY, which often is a ‘patchwork’ stitching together various beginnings and endings of biblical verses. For instance, if you examine the ancient verses for Dómine, vivífica me (30th Sunday in Ordinary Time) you’ll discover this being done in a most perplexing way. Rebecca Maloy published a very expensive book on the OFFERTORY, but it was a disappointment. Indeed, I can’t think of a single valuable insight contained in her book. What a missed opportunity!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “In Paradisum” • Gregorian Chant
    As a RECESSIONAL on All Souls’ Day (November 2nd), we will sing In Paradísum Dedúcant Te Ángeli (PDF). When it comes to Gregorian Chant, this is one of the most popular “songs.” Frankly, all the prayers and chants from the traditional REQUIEM MASS (Missa exsequialis or Missa pro defunctis) are incredibly powerful and never should’ve been scuttled. Click here to hear “In Paradisum” in a recording I made this afternoon. Professor Louis Bouyer spoke of the way Bugnini “scuttled the office of the dead” in this fascinating excerpt from his memoirs. In his book, La riforma litugica (1983), Bugnini bragged—in quite a shameful way—about eliminating the ancient funeral texts, and even admitted those venerable texts were “beloved” (his word) by Catholics.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • All Souls (2 November)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 2 November 2025, which is the Commemoration of All the Faithful Departed (“All Souls”). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the top-notch feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin. In my humble opinion, it’s weird to have the feast of All Saints on a Sunday. No wonder the close associate of Pope Saint Paul VI said the revised KALENDAR was “the handiwork of a trio of maniacs.” However, I can’t deny that sometimes the sacred liturgy consists of elements that are seemingly contradictory: e.g. the Mode 7 “De Profúndis” ALLELUIA, or the Mode 8 “Dulce lignum” ALLELUIA on the various ancient feasts of the Holy Cross (3 May, 14 September, and so on).
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 12 October 2025) talks about an ‘irony’ or ‘paradox’ regarding the 1960s switch to a wider use (amplior locus) of vernacular in the liturgy.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

Religious worship supplies all our spiritual need, and suits every mood of mind and variety of circumstance.

— John Henry Cardinal Newman

Recent Posts

  • “Reader Feedback” • 5 November 2025
  • Never Work For A Priest Or Bishop Who Believes Sacred Music Should Be “Entertainment”
  • When Pilgrims Sing, the World Disappears
  • “Offertory” at Catholic Funerals
  • “In Paradisum” • Gregorian Chant

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.