• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Attic Recordings, “Rach 3,” and Church Musicians

Jeff Ostrowski · July 1, 2013

HE BETTER PART of my years in high school were spent “trading,” and I’m not referring to stock market trading. I’m talking about trading recordings of the “Golden Age” pianists: Lipatti, Rachmaninov, Cortot, Godowski, Friedman, and so forth. In those days, everything was “cassette” tapes (youngsters won’t know what these are). The first time I ever heard Hofmann play Chopin’s 4th Ballade, it was from an old LP record in the library. It’s unbelievable how times have changed.

In the late 1990s, many important recordings were not available in the United States (believe it or not, even essential things like Horowitz performing the 3rd Scherzo of Chopin). Therefore, I would trade with collectors in Thailand, Italy, Belgium, Canada, and many other places. I remember one time when my mother got worried. She exclaimed, “Why are you receiving packages from China?” My calm response was, “Don’t worry, Mom: it’s just the Brahms-Paganini Variations played by Wilhelm Backhaus.” That’s a great recording, by the way!

ALL THIS HAS BEEN CHANGED, thanks to YouTube. These days, people are posting the most spectacular recordings for all to enjoy. These are gems I would have given my right arm to possess years ago. I remember dreaming of being given access to the “live” Carnegie Hall recording by Horowitz of Liszt’s 6th Rhapsody. Ivan Davis spoke in awed tones about his octaves in this performance . . . and now we can hear it on YouTube! And you know what’s really crazy? People are posting recordings that have been held in their attics for 50 years! Incredible, no?

For example, people used to only speak of three (3) recordings by Horowitz of Rachmaninov’s Third Concerto: Coates (1930), Reiner (1951), and Ormandy (1978). Nerds like me realized all along that the very best performance was the “live” Horowitz/Barbirolli in 1941. I’ve had this recording since 1998, and anybody who’s heard it knows it is the greatest ever made hands down.

Well, it turns out there is another “live” recording of Horowitz playing the Rachmaninov 3rd Concerto, from 1944, with Rodzinski conducting. This performance is not quite as wonderful as the 1941 Barbirolli, but it’s still worth hearing! (By the way, it’s missing a few sections here and there, so it’s not a complete recording.) You can Google all these recordings by yourself, but let me just share a few examples of the 1st movement Cadenza:

      * *  1941 Horowitz/Barbirolli Cadenza “live” [mp3]

      * *  1939 Rachmaninov/Ormandy Cadenza [mp3]

      * *  1944 Horowitz/Rodzinski Cadenza “live” [mp3]

Incidentally, both Horowitz and Rachmaninov play the “Ossia” version of the Cadenza. If you want to hear the “normal” cadenza, listen to Gieseking:

      * *  1939 Gieseking “live” with Rachmaninov in the audience [mp3]

      * *  1940 Gieseking “live” [mp3]

Gieseking was a fantastic pianist. I never knew he played wrong notes until I heard those recordings! Here’s what somebody says of the Gieseking recordings:

After great success with Rachmaninoff Concerto No. 2, in 1938 Barbirolli suggested to Gieseking that he play No 3 and their collaboration took place the following season, documented on this CD. The work is given without cuts, and Gieseking plays the bigger first movement cadenza.

This is a reckless, dazzling performance quite different from the way the concerto is played by most of today’s pianists. The first movement opening is quite slow. Gieseking’s treatment of Rachmaninoff’s flowing themes is rather prosaic, some might say even insensitive. His attack of the original cadenza leaves many notes by the wayside (mishaps that occur often throughout the concerto) but there is no question of the visceral excitement produced—this from a pianist best-known for his Debussy and Ravel. It is fascinating to hear the final notes of the concerto played so deliberately, the same way Horowitz (unusual for him) played them in his 1950 Hollywood Bowl “live” performance with Koussevitzky.

Rachmaninoff was in the audience for this performance and had a long conversation with Gieseking afterwards, evidently expressing his approval—and surprise at the concerto being presented uncut and with the original first movement cadenza. Another Gieseking Rachmaninoff Third is available from a concert March 28, 1940 with Mengelberg and the Concertgebouw. This (coupled with a Rachmaninoff Second from October 1940) is an even more slap-dash affair, missed notes galore and an impetuous forward drive (and, as one might expect from Mengelberg, very deliberate concluding bars). Mengelberg’s accompaniment is unique and he’s with Gieseking all the way—a flawed but exciting performance, available on Music & Arts (CD 4250). CD notes mention that Gieseking was to have recorded the Third with Karajan (an unlikely conductor for this repertory) for EMI. Kudos to Music & Arts for once again making important “live” performances available to collectors.

Three years later (May 1941) Barbirolli would conduct Rachmaninoff Three again, this time with Horowitz as soloist, one of the most electrifying performances preserved on recording.   Source

THERE IS SO MUCH MORE I had planned to share with you, but I see I have gone on too long already. Therefore, let me stop here (and “offer up” the unfinished thoughts to our Lord).

Why did I share these thoughts? What does all this have to do with Church musicians? The point is, God is in control. I used to feel very special because I had amazing recordings nobody else did. It turns out, in the blink of an eye, everyone can have those recordings. This is a reminder to us: God is in control. We might think we’re in control. We might think we have it “all figured out.” However, in the blink of an eye, God can change everything. Let us always make sure that no matter how we spend our time, we won’t end up regretting it for all eternity.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Jeff Ostrowski

Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004). He resides with his wife and children in Michigan. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    Why A “Fugue” Here?
    I believe I know why this plainsong harmonizer created a tiny fugue as the INTRODUCTION to his accompaniment. Take a look (PDF) and tell me your thoughts about what he did on the feast of the Flight of Our Lord Jesus Christ into Egypt (17 February). And now I must go because “tempus fugit” as they say!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 12 October 2025) talks about an ‘irony’ or ‘paradox’ regarding the 1960s switch to a wider use (amplior locus) of vernacular in the liturgy.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Reminder” — Month of October (2025)
    Those who don’t sign up for our free EMAIL NEWSLETTER miss important notifications. Last week, for example, I sent a message about this job opening for a music director paying $65,000 per year plus benefits (plus weddings & funerals). Notice the job description says: “our vision for sacred music is to move from singing at Mass to truly singing the Mass wherein … especially the propers, ordinaries, and dialogues are given their proper place.” Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “American Catholic Hymnal” (1991)
    The American Catholic Hymnal, with IMPRIMATUR granted (25 April 1991) by the Archdiocese of Chicago, is like a compendium of every horrible idea from the 1980s. Imagine being forced to stand all through Communion (even afterwards) when those self-same ‘enlightened’ liturgists moved the SEQUENCE before the Alleluia to make sure congregations wouldn’t have to stand during it. (Even worse, everything about the SEQUENCE—including its name—means it should follow the Alleluia.) And imagine endlessly repeating “Alleluia” during Holy Communion at every single Mass. It was all part of an effort to convince people that Holy Communion was historically a procession (which it wasn’t).
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Canonic” • Ralph Vaughan Williams
    Fifty years ago, Dr. Theodore Marier made available this clever arrangement (PDF) of “Come down, O love divine” by P. R. Dietterich. The melody was composed in 1906 by Ralph Vaughan Williams (d. 1958) and named in honor of of his birthplace: DOWN AMPNEY. The arrangement isn’t a strict canon, but it does remind one of a canon since the pipe organ employs “points of imitation.” The melody and text are #709 in the Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Did they simplify these hymn harmonies?
    Choirs love to sing the famous & splendid tune called “INNSBRUCK.” Looking through a (Roman Catholic) German hymnal printed in 1952, I discovered what appears to be a simplified version of that hymn. In other words, their harmonization is much less complex than the version found in the Saint Jean de Brébeuf Hymnal (which is suitable for singing by SATB choir). Please download their 1952 harmonization (PDF) and let me know your thoughts. I really like the groovy Germanic INTRODUCTION they added.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“The chapter decides to penalize singers or instrumentalists who are tardy by a few minutes at the same rate as if they had been absent the whole hour.” [From “The Life of Father Francisco Guerrero.”]

— Sevilla: Chapter Resolution (2 June 1563 )

Recent Posts

  • The Real Miracle of Gregorian Chant
  • Why A “Fugue” Here?
  • “Three Reasons To Shun Bad Hymns” • Daniel B. Marshall
  • “Puzzling Comment” • By A Respected FSSP Priest
  • New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.