About this blogger:
A theorist, organist, and conductor, Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004), and did graduate work in Musicology. He serves as choirmaster for the new FSSP parish in Los Angeles, where he resides with his wife and children.
Connect on Facebook:
Connect on Twitter:
“In everything of any importance at all, Sarum (and all other mediæval rites) was simply Roman, the rite which we still use.”
— Fr. Adrian Fortescue (1912)

Chants for the Feast of the Transfiguration
published 2 August 2017 by Jeff Ostrowski

F YOU SCROLL towards the bottom of St. René Goupil, you will notice that scores and audio files for the Feast of the Transfiguration have been added (6 August).

Here is a sample:

The rest of this post deals with the ending of the Communion antiphon.

The Communion antiphon (“Visiónem quam vidístis”) is identical to a Magnificat antiphon, except for one note:

4779 Feast of the Transfiguration

At first, it seemed a typo, since the Vatican Edition of the Antiphonale appeared several years after the Graduale.

Further examination, however, shows that some manuscripts only have the punctum:

4770 who

…while other manuscripts have the podatus:

Dom Mocquereau’s 1903 Liber Usualis has a podatus:

4773 Mocquereau 1903

Abbot Pothier’s 1891 Liber Gradualis has a punctum:

1891 Pothier

Pothier’s 1896 Liber Usualis has the punctum for the Magnificat antiphon:

4773 1896 Pothier

…but the selfsame book (Pothier’s 1896 Liber Usualis) uses the podatus for the Communion antiphon:

4773 Pothier was well 1896

Using the search function to quickly find “visionem” in the NOH shows how the composers provided a completely different harmonization both times:

    * *  2,279 pages of Harmonized Plainsong

For the record, the NOH has a typo in the Communion antiphon:

4768 errors

Never have I encountered so many typos in one feast! Yesterday, I spoke of a typo in the Introit that desperately needed correction.