• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Organists: Know Thy Sheep!

Richard J. Clark · October 3, 2014

HIS PAST SUMMER, the National Convention of the American Guild of Organists was held in Boston. I was privileged to be part of a panel discussion called The Future of the Organ in Contemporary Worship. While directed to organists who work for many denominations, a number of universal truths apply.

The organ’s use in worship is often in survival mode and its supremacy is no longer a given. How do we keep it alive in the face of so many challenges to shut it down? Much of what I spoke about during the convention, I have already written about here.

Despite what Vatican II has to say about the use of the pipe organ in liturgy, that “In the Latin Church the pipe organ is to be held in high esteem…” (Sacrosanctum Concilium §120) it is wise have an awareness of how those in our congregations view the pipe organ and their experience of it during the liturgy. We must know our sheep! Not that one should ever plan liturgy according to popular decree, it is helpful to know where our congregations stand, so we can do a better job in meeting them where they are. Once we do that, we can better cultivate and advocate for the pipe organ in liturgy, just as we do for Gregorian Chant and singing the mass.

Realize that when it comes to music in liturgy, everyone is an expert. In part I am being facetious, but since music directly affects everyone quite personally, people are in fact experts regarding their own experiences. We must take this seriously. People know what they like and what they don’t like. They know how they feel. Therefore, it’s imperative to know where your congregation is at so that you can meet them there. Only then can you gently challenge and uplift.

LSO ON THIS AGO PANEL DISCUSSION was my esteemed colleague, Bernadette Colley, Director of Music and Organist at the Church of Our Redeemer in Lexington, Massachusetts. Prior to the convention she worked exceptionally hard to poll her congregation, obtaining as large a sample as possible. She brought her expertise as founder of Colley Consulting, a research consultancy specializing in arts education policy. While hers is not a Roman Catholic environment, her results may reveal some familiar and universal traits.

In a follow-up article for her congregation, Bernadette wrote about this poll:

(The) responses were both enlightening and informative in conveying…the ways in which congregants themselves express their relationship to the pipe organ as an element of meaningful worship. Audience members (at the convention) were interested to hear how congregation members articulated their relationship to the organ as an element of worship.

Here were her questions and results. Does any of this sound familiar?

1 • To what extent does the pipe organ’s inclusion as a worship component influence
the quality of your worship experience?

Answers centered on themes of:
  a) Purpose/Substance, e.g. organ viewed as a connector to “worship” “church” “history”
  b) Degree: e.g. ranging from organ greatly enhances, to not enhances, to detracts
  c) Reasons, e.g. adjectives associated with organ such as “Meditative, Rich, Beautiful, Powerful, Humble, Full, Awesome, Majestic, Prayerful, and Quiet”

2 • Describe the best and worst aspects of having the pipe organ, or an alternative instrument, (piano or guitar); accompany hymns in worship services…

a) Regarding the pipe organ –
  i. Best: Organ’s timbre; history; good for “old hymns”; its “power” or “fullness”
  ii. Worst: Organ is: too loud; too expensive; can be muddled/slow

b) Regarding the piano and/or guitar –
  i. Best: Both good for “contemporary” styles of, e.g., folk, spiritual, because of their “warmth” “intimacy” “informality”
  ii. Worst: Ranging from: instruments are thin, can’t provide as much “leadership”; no sense of tradition; to “not suitable at ALL in church”

3 • To what extent do organ solos as preludes, instrumental interludes, and postludes, enhance or detract from your worship experience?

  Most respondents felt instrumental solos were an enhancement; a few said “take them or leave them”. The functions that these serve in worship included: communication, mood setting, music appreciation, ritual lubrication, and allowing for introspection with God.

4 • If you could send a recommendation, request, or piece of advice to church
organists about the future of their profession, what would it be?

  In general, messages suggested organists: “Diversify” OR “Advocate for your instrument”
OR both.

5 • How important is it, do you feel, for newly built worship spaces to include pipe
organs? Please explain.

  Some respondents felt it essential, some not at all, and a number said it depends on the
individual congregation’s discernment of the issue.

HERE DOES YOUR CONREGATION STAND with regards to the pipe organ? What can you do to cultivate a more positive response? I believe the key question posed by Bernadette was essentially this: To what extent does the pipe organ influence the quality of your worship experience?

The pipe organ is there to serve the liturgy, not the other way around. The organ is in service to prayer. Organists must be supremely mindful of this. I will try to remember this myself.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Pipe Organ Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Richard J. Clark

Richard J. Clark is the Director of Music of the Archdiocese of Boston and the Cathedral of the Holy Cross.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 21 September 2025) discusses some theological items—supported by certain verses in ancient Catholic hymns—and ends by explaining why certain folks become delirious with jealousy when they observe feats by Monsignor Ronald Knox.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
    It’s always amusing to see old diocesan newspapers—in huge capital letters—advertising the Cheapest Catholic Paper in the United States. The correspondent who sent this to me added: “I can think of certain composers, published by large companies in our own day, who could truthfully brag about the most tawdry compositions in the world!” I wonder what she could have meant by such a cryptic comment…
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies
    Along with so many others, I have deep respect for Dom Gregory Gregory Murray, who produced this clever harmonization (PDF) of “O SANCTISSIMA.” It’s always amazed me that Dom Gregory—a truly inspired composer—was so confused when it came to GREGORIAN CHANT. Throughout his life, he published contradictory statements, veering back-and-forth like a weather vane. Toward the end of his life, he declared: “I see clearly that the need for reform in liturgical music arose, not in the 18th and 19th centuries, but a thousand years earlier—in the 8th and 9th centuries, or even before that. The abuses began, not with Mozart and Haydn, but with those over-enthusiastic medieval musicians who developed the elaborate and flamboyant Gregorian Chant.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Karl Keating • “Canonization Questions”
    We were sent an internet statement (screenshot) that’s garnered significant attention, in which KARL KEATING (founder of Catholic Answers) speaks about whether canonizations are infallible. Mr. Keating seems unaware that canonizations are—in the final analysis—a theological opinion. They are not infallible, as explained in this 2014 article by a priest (with a doctorate in theology) who worked for multiple popes. Mr. Keating says: “I’m unaware of such claims arising from any quarter until several recent popes disliked by these Traditionalists were canonized, including John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II. Usually Paul VI receives the most opprobrium.” Mr. Keating is incorrect; e.g. Father John Vianney, several centuries ago, taught clearly that canonizations are not infallible. Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen would be another example, although clearly much more recent than Saint John Vianney.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Vatican II Changed Wedding Propers?
    It’s often claimed that the wedding propers were changed after Vatican II. As a matter of fact, that is a false claim. The EDITIO VATICANA propers (Introit: Deus Israel) remained the same after Vatican II. However, a new set of propers (Introit: Ecce Deus) was provided for optional use. The same holds true for the feast of Pope Saint Gregory the Great on 3 September: the 1943 propers (Introit: Si díligis me) were provided for optional use, but the traditional PROPRIA MISSAE (Introit: Sacerdótes Dei) were retained; they weren’t gotten rid of. The Ordo Cantus Missae (1970) makes this crystal clear, as does the Missal itself. There was an effort made in the post-conciliar years to eliminate so-called “Neo-Gregorian” chants, but (contrary to popular belief) most were retained: cf. the feast of Christ the King, the feast of the Immaculate Conception, and so forth.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Solemn “Salve Regina” (Chant)
    How many “S” words can you think of using alliteration? How about Schwann Solemn Salve Score? You can download the SOLEMN SALVE REGINA in Gregorian Chant. The notation follows the official rhythm (EDITIO VATICANA). Canon Jules Van Nuffel, choirmaster of the Cathedral of Saint Rumbold, composed this accompaniment for it (although some feel it isn’t his best work).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“Orlando de Lassus died in Munich on 14 June 1594, the selfsame day his employer decided to dismiss him for economic reasons. He never saw the letter.”

— New Grove

Recent Posts

  • New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
  • How do you pronounce this word in Latin?
  • Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
  • Children’s Repertoire: “3 Recommendations”
  • PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.