• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
    • “Let the Choir Have a Voice” (Essay)
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Introductory Rites: Madness or Preparation?

Richard J. Clark · July 11, 2014

OR A REASON I CANNOT EXPLAIN, the Introductory Rites are the most misunderstood and mangled part of the mass, even by good priests who tend not to exhibit liturgical problems elsewhere. More specifically, the Penitential Act and Kyrie are routinely a problem area. It falls into one of two extremes: 1• It is rarely a problem. 2• It is routinely botched nearly every Sunday. But it doesn’t end there.

I don’t have the answer why many good, conscientious priests do not understand the structure of the three forms of the Penitential Act and its relationship with the Kyrie. (Many musicians do not either!) My observations are drawn from a wide variety of circumstances, professional and personal.

For example, here is a recent conversation with a priest whom, by the way, I greatly admire:
    Priest: Are you doing a Kyrie?
    Me (Voice inside my head): DOING a Kyrie? What?
    Me (Outside voice): We will sing the Kyrie as part of Penitential Act C.
    Priest: What’s that?
    Me: We will sing the invocations within the Kyrie. We will then sing the Gloria after the Absolution.
    Priest: Great!

As such, two of the most common problems I encounter (and there are many others) are 1• those who believe singing the Kyrie replaces the Penitential Act, i.e., sing the Penitential Act, Form C without the invocations 2• Omitting the Kyrie after the Penitential Act when using Form A (Confiteor) or Form B.

As such, these two articles on the Kyrie will clarify much:
      * *  Lord, Have Mercy? Andrew Motyka
      * *  Is the Kyrie Part of the Penitential Rite? Jeff Ostrowski

UT WITH CONFUSION COMES OPPORTUNITY. The Introductory rites, and their potential variations, (e.g., Sprinkling during the Easter Season) offer an opportunity for Music Directors and priests to get together and discuss the Introductory rites, at least for logistical reasons. This is a necessity anyway. It also offers an opportunity to find what the pastor’s preferences are for the Penitential Act. If you are lucky, this may open the door to constructive dialogue regarding more elements of the Introductory Rites and the liturgy in general.

What is the Purpose of the Introductory Rites?

I recently attended a mass with my family (in and of itself a rare occurrence) and experienced yet another common set of problems. After the Entrance Hymn the priest had a few words to say about the readings of the day. While this practice is not my preference, it is very common and can be done well if pointed and brief. The GIRM only allows this if there is no music, but it is common practice nonetheless.

GIRM #48. If there is no singing at the Entrance, the antiphon given in the Missal is recited either by the faithful, or by some of them, or by a reader; otherwise, it is recited by the Priest himself, who may even adapt it as an introductory explanation (cf. no. 31).

Unfortunately, this introductory explanation morphed into a rambling ferverino which awkwardly segued into the Confiteor (Penitential Act, Form A), thus skipping the Sign of the Cross, and the Greeting. After the absolution, the Kyrie was skipped. The Gloria was then recited.

I will not draw a personal judgment from this. Although it was indeed very sloppy, these kinds of improvised accretions and omissions, while well intended, are sadly all too common. (The rest of the mass had no such problems and the priest was very kind to my children afterward. I thanked this kind priest for his prayers.)

My objection to all of this was not the lack of compliance with the GIRM. My objection to such loose practices is based in missing the very purpose of these rites which is to prepare ourselves for what comes after. The GIRM succinctly states:

A. The Introductory Rites 46. The rites that precede the Liturgy of the Word, namely, the Entrance, the Greeting, the Penitential Act, the Kyrie, the Gloria in excelsis (Glory to God in the highest) and Collect, have the character of a beginning, an introduction, and a preparation. Their purpose is to ensure that the faithful, who come together as one, establish communion and dispose themselves properly to listen to the Word of God and to celebrate the Eucharist worthily.

“Worthily” is a key word (something I will always struggle to achieve). Furthermore, the people to do not deserve an unprepared and altered preparation. A pastoral approach is to enter into preparation that quiets the heart (i.e., the Sacred Silence in the Penitential Act and after the invitation to pray, GIRM #45) Likewise, as musicians, we are very much part of this preparation. We are not commissioned simply to execute the musical portions, but to do so with the spirit of their context: to prepare people to hear the Word and enter into the Sacred Mysteries, worthily and not haphazardly or half-heartedly with our music.

The GRM for the Entrance states its purpose well:

GIRM #47. When the people are gathered, and as the Priest enters with the Deacon and ministers, the Entrance Chant begins. Its purpose is to open the celebration, foster the unity of those who have been gathered, introduce their thoughts to the mystery of the liturgical time or festivity, and accompany the procession of the Priest and ministers.

HE INTRODUCTORY RITES ARE WONDERFULLY STRUCTURED to foster spiritual and mindful preparation. This is not something we simply DO and check off on our list. When we prepare in mind and spirit, the details that seem ancillary at first may take on a greater light. The simplicity, shape and rhythm of the Introductory Rites do the faithful a great service in opening their hearts and minds to receive our Lord in Word and in the Eucharist. Let us allow ourselves to be shaped by them and the greatness that follows.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Introductory Rites, Penitential Act Lord Have Mercy Kyrie Eleison Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Richard J. Clark

Richard J. Clark is the Director of Music of the Archdiocese of Boston and the Cathedral of the Holy Cross.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    Pipe Organ “Answers” in Plainsong?
    In 2003, I copied a book by Félix Bélédin (d. 1895), who was titular organist—from 1841 to 1874—at the Cathedral of Saint John the Baptist in Lyon (France). In 2008, we scanned and uploaded the book to the Lalande Online Library. Nobody knows for sure when the book was published; some believe it first appeared in the 1840s. In any event, one who examines this excerpt, showing GLORIA IX might wonder why it says the organ answers in plainsong. However, the front of the book explains, telling the organist explicitly when to “respond in plainchant.” This is something called organ alternatim. Believe it or not, the pipe organ would take turns with the choir, playing certain texts instrumentally instead of having them sung. I’m not very well-versed in this—pardon the pun—but if memory serves, ORGAN ALTERNATIM was frowned upon by the time of Pope Saint Pius X. Nevertheless, French organists kept doing it, even after it was explicitly condemned as an abuse.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Music List • (5th Sunday of Lent)
    Readers have expressed interest in seeing the ORDER OF MUSIC I created for this coming Sunday, which is the 5th Sunday of Lent (22 March 2026). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. Traditionally, this Sunday was called ‘Passion’ Sunday. Starting in 1956, certain church leaders attempted rename both ‘Passion’ Sunday and ‘Palm’ Sunday—but it didn’t work. For example, Monsignor Frederick McManus tried to get people to call PALM SUNDAY “Second Passion Sunday”—but the faithful rejected that. I encourage all the readers to visit the feasts website, where the Propria Missae may be downloaded completely free of charge.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Music List • (Holy Thursday, 2026)
    Readers have expressed interest in seeing the ORDER OF MUSIC I created for Holy Thursday, which is 2 April 2026. If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. I’m not sure I’ve ever heard a more piercingly beautiful INTROIT, and I have come to absolutely love the SATB version of ‘Ubi cáritas’ we are singing (joined by our burgeoning children’s choir). I encourage all the readers to visit the feasts website, where the Propria Missae may be downloaded completely free of charge.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Gregorian Chant Quiz” • 24 March 2026
    How well do you know your Gregorian hymns? Do you recognize the tune inserted into the bass line on this score? For many years, we sang the entire Mass in Gregorian chant—and I mean everything. As a result, it would be difficult to find a Gregorian hymn I don’t recognize instantly. Only decades later did I realize (with sadness) that this skill cannot be ‘monetized’… This particular melody is used for a very famous Gregorian hymn, printed in the LIBER USUALIS. Do you recognize it? Send me an email with the correct words, and I promise to tell everybody I meet about your prowess!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • “Ubi Caritas” (SATB)
    I remember singing “Ubi Cáritas” by Maurice Duruflé at the conservatory. I was deeply moved by it. However, some feel Duruflé’s version isn’t suitable for small choirs since it’s written for 6 voices and the bass tessitura is quite low. That’s why I was absolutely thrilled to discover this “Ubi cáritas” (SATB) for smaller choirs by Énemond Moreau, who studied with OSCAR DEPUYDT (d. 1925), an orphan who became a towering figure of Catholic music. Depuydt’s students include: Flor Peeters (d. 1986); Monsignor Jules Van Nuffel (d. 1953); Arthur Meulemans (d. 1966); Monsignor Jules Vyverman (d. 1989); and Gustaaf Nees (d. 1965). Rehearsal videos for each individual voice await you at #19705. When I came across the astonishing English translation for “Ubi Cáritas” by Monsignor Ronald Knox—matching the Latin’s meter—I decided to add those lyrics as an option (for churches which have banned Latin). My wife and I made this recording to give you some idea how it sounds.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • “Holy, Holy, Holy”
    For vigil Masses on Saturday (a.k.a. “anticipated” Masses) we use this simpler setting of the “Holy, Holy, Holy” by Monsignor Jules Vyverman (d. 1989), a Belgian priest, organist, composer, and music educator who ultimately succeeded another ‘Jules’ (CANON JULES VAN NUFFEL) as director of the Lemmensinstituut in Belgium. Although I could be wrong, my understanding is that the LEMMENSINSTITUUT eventually merged with “Catholic University of Leuven” (originally founded in 1425). That’s the university Fulton J. Sheen attended.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“Until Pope Paul VI, there has not been a single pope who introduced the type of fundamental changes in liturgical forms which we are now witnessing. In fact, we must note that even small changes in the liturgy introduced by a pope have never been readily accepted.”

— Monsignor Klaus Gamber (d. 1989)

Recent Posts

  • From Sentiment to Sacrament: Reclaiming Sacred Music for the Wedding Mass
  • Pipe Organ “Answers” in Plainsong?
  • “Gregorian Chant Quiz” • 24 March 2026
  • “Versions of the Psalter” • Jeff Interviews Top Biblical Scholar: Dr. Mark Giszczak
  • PDF Download • “Ubi Caritas” (SATB)

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2026 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.