About this blogger:
Richard J. Clark has served since 1989 as Music Director and Organist at Saint Cecilia Church in Boston, Massachusetts. He is also Chapel Organist (Saint Mary’s Chapel) at Boston College. For the Archdiocese of Boston, he directed the Office of Divine Worship Saint Cecilia Schola. His compositions have been performed on four continents.
Connect on Facebook:
Connect on Twitter:
"Upon the road, René was always occupied with God. His words and the discourses he held were all expressive of submission to the commands of Divine Providence, and showed a willing acceptance of the death which God was sending him. He gave himself to God as a sacrifice, to be reduced to ashes by the fires of the Iroquois, which that good Father's hand would kindle. He sought the means to bless Him in all things and everywhere. Covered with wounds as he himself was, Goupil dressed the wounds of other persons, of the enemies who had received some blows in the fight as well as those of the prisoners. He opened the vein for a sick Iroquois. And he did it all with as much charity as if he had done it to persons who were his best friends."
— St. Isaac Jogues (writing in 1643)

Improvising – and Praying – on the Propers
published 10 January 2014 by Richard J. Clark

N RECENT YEARS, I HAVE ADOPTED THE HABIT of improvising on the propers when appropriate and applicable. Most often, this may be at a mass without choir, or perhaps one of the “off-peak” masses. This also comes in the form of the occasional prelude improvisation, usually on the Introit. In doing so, one can never be reminded enough of these words from the Second Vatican Council:

“In the Latin Church the pipe organ is to be held in high esteem, for it is the traditional instrument which adds a wonderful splendor to the Church’s ceremonies and powerfully lifts up man’s mind to God and to higher things.” (Sacrosanctum Concilium, 120),
Coupled with the above phrase must be the following:

“Therefore sacred music is to be considered the more holy in proportion as it is more closely connected with the liturgical action…” (Sacrosanctum Concillium § 112)

When one can print the text in a worship aid, the prayerful connection is easily made. However, when this is not the case, what purpose does it serve, and why persist in doing it? The answer is more closely related to the interior prayer life of the organist. Not only is a melody the subject of improvisation, but also the text must be in the heart of the improviser throughout!

To make a habit of carrying these texts in one’s heart on a regular basis can only be helpful to the prayer life of the organist. But what does this accomplish for anyone else? What does this accomplish liturgically? Well, a few things. First of all, a must read is Part Four of Dr. William Mahrt’s “The Musical Shape of the Liturgy: The Function of the Organ.” Dr. Marhrt points out the ancient common practice:

“The prescription found in medieval liturgical books that a melody which is to be carried by the organ is cantabitur in organis (it shall be sung upon the organ), or even dicetur in organis (it shall be said on the organ), and it acknowledges this function of implicitly bearing the text.”

However, this applies to well-known sacred melodies that a listener would easily recognize. The most common example are masses sung in alternatum with the organ. It is clearly understood what the text is whether sung or played.

But what about melodies that are unfamiliar, especially in a present-day context? Consider too, that the heart of improvisation is elaboration. Then what? Does anyone have any idea what we are doing? Is it important? Very few Offertory melodies are being whistled on the way out the door.

In such cases, one would not argue that the organ is speaking the text in the sense of ”dicetur in organis” (it shall be said on the organ). Rather, the music must serve to the heart of prayer in of itself, as well as serve the ongoing liturgical action, which improvisation tends to do fairly well.

CLOSE FRIEND, A PRIEST once told me years ago something I’ve never forgotten. “The people don’t need to know what it is to understand it.” In other words, they will understand the prayer interiorly if not in words. Since hearing that, I have always thought it important to play and pray music related to a relevant text. This is not an excuse for laziness and to not provide texts in worship aids. But in times when texts are not readily available, or even if they are, the liturgical understanding is not present, one relies on faith that what the musician prays edifies and transports those with open ears open to prayer.

Another friend recently wrote to me, “I don’t think that the average Catholic has a conscious appreciation of our need for sacred mystery.” However, I believe that there might be a subconscious hunger for the sacred mysteries. While this may sound silly to some of us, it is worth the reminder to never be afraid of expressing mystery. Improvisation does this quite well as it unleashes the spirit. Coupled with Gregorian Chant, improvisation gives further voice to the sacred. Do not be afraid of the mystery!

ERE I OFFER TWO somewhat random examples from the twenty-third Sunday in Ordinary Time. While crude videos, they were recorded during mass, hopefully retaining the continuity of the liturgical action. In somewhat of a colorful French, yet modal language, I hope my limited improvisational skills assist in prayer.

Hopefully, if we make a habit of keeping the prayers of the propers in our hearts, we will ourselves become converted and transformed in the ways we most need. This in turn may assist in all the other work that we must do.

There is power in improvisation and in prayer.