• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Lesson 10: Modality and Psalm Tones

Modality is not a difficult concept to grasp, when one understands that it is practical in nature. Since the early centuries of the Church, a very common format for Gregorian chant was:

    Antiphon—Psalm verse—Antiphon—Psalm verse—Antiphon, etc.

Needless to say, it was very important that the Antiphon connected nicely with the Psalm verse, and vice versa. Choosing a Psalm tone that did not connect well with the Antiphon was just asking for trouble. They needed a system to facilitate this process, and that is the origin of the Modal system.

At first, they started classifying the Antiphons based on the beginning pitch. This is totally logical, based on the aforementioned pattern of Antiphon and Psalm verses in succession. However, they eventually decided it would be better to classify Antiphons based on the ending pitch. Either way would probably work, but in the end, the ending pitch prevailed (pardon the pun). The ending pitch is called the final or finalis.

Therefore, simply locate the final, and that tells you the Mode of the piece:

Pretty simple, right? However, you are not finished, because you have to decide whether it is authentic or plagal. Odd numbers (1, 3, 5, 7) are authentic. Even numbers (2, 4, 6, 8) are plagal. Authentic Modes have a higher range. Plagal Modes have a lower range.

Have you ever wondered what those little numbers are? The ones listed in the Index of the chant books? They tell you the mode:

The Mode is also listed at the very beginning of each chant:

But what if a piece of Gregorian chant has a range (“ambitus”) that extends both high and low? Obviously, it could be authentic or plagal, and I suspect that the editors simply flipped a coin in such circumstances. What if the piece has a very limited range, say, only three notes? The editors either flip a coin, or (sometimes) they will not assign a mode. Sometimes, rather than flipping a coin, the editors consulted ancient MSS of the Antiphonale or Graduale to help them decide. However, the ancient MSS themselves frequently disagreed about Modal assignment. I have seen 10th century Antiphonals where the same exact chant is classified differently. We must not lose sleep over this, because the assignment was purely practical: as long as the Psalm verses connected nicely, nothing else mattered.

The astute reader is probably asking the following question:

If Modality is purely practical, then why do we classify all chants? For instance, the Alleluia Verse was never sung as Antiphon—Psalm verse—Antiphon—Psalm verse—Antiphon? Why, then, does it have a Modal classification?

The answer is quite simple: musicians became accustomed to classifying the chants, and as the centuries rolled along it seemed natural to classify all the chants according to Mode. Also, a common practice was to organize each Antiphonale or Gradual according to Mode, and I feel this practice must have had an influence, as well.

Sometimes the final of the Mode plays a big role in the chant. Sometimes it does not. Some authors consider the dominant (a.k.a. “co-final” or “tenor”) to be the second most important note of the Mode. Sometimes the dominant plays a big role in the chant. Sometimes it does not. Looking at the the Introit Intret orátio mea, we notice that throughout the entire piece, the final is only sung three times, yet the piece still has to be called Mode 3 because it ends on MI:

At first glance, Benedícta et venerábilis es (PDF) appears to end on RE, so why is it Mode 4? A careful examination shows that while the Verse ends on RE, the actual Gradual ends on MI. The Church allows the first section of the Gradual to be repeated, so (perhaps) there is an argument to be made that this Gradual should always be sung repeating the first section.

As time went on, “Modal theory” began to exert and influence on melodies that had existed for centuries, and (frankly) began to mangle some. However, even to this day, there are still some chants that “defy” Modal theory, like Kyrie IV, which ends on LA. Many Graduals also end on LA, by the way. For theories on how such a thing came to be, see Willi Apel’s book, Gregorian chant.

Once you know the Mode, you can easily transition between Antiphons and Psalm verses. The easiest way to learn about the different “Simple” Psalm tones is to visit Psalmi in Notis (URL), which has numerous books wherein each verse is carefully written out for every single Psalm tone. To learn about the “Solemn” Psalm tones, download Versus Psalmorum et Canticorum (PDF), or visit Communio (URL) and scroll to the bottom.

Simple Psalm tones are the more common ones, and are generally “accentual” — that is, based on the tonic accent of the Latin words. Solemn Psalm tones are slightly less common, and are often “cursive” rather than “accentual.” Sometimes it is said that Latin Psalm tones are based “solely on the Latin tonic accent.” This is not technically true, since many are cursive rather than accentual.

GO BACK

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)
    Some have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I prepared for the 17th Sunday in Ordinary Time (27 July 2025). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the the feasts website.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Communion • “Ask & You Shall Receive”
    All of the chants for 27 July 2025 have been added to the feasts website, as usual under a convenient “drop down” menu. The COMMUNION ANTIPHON (both text and melody) are exceedingly beautiful and ancient.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Jeff’s Mother Joins Our Fundraiser
    To assist our fundraiser, Mrs. Kathleen Ostrowski has drawn several beautiful sketches which she offers to all our readers free of charge. If you have a moment, I invite you download them at this link.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“When we force a boy to be a mediocrity in a dozen subjects we destroy his standards, perhaps for life.”

— C. S. Lewis

Recent Posts

  • False! • “Youthful” Music Attracts the Young
  • “I Don’t Care Anymore!” • Lead by Loving Example
  • Installment #2 • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
  • PDF Comparison Chart • “Serious Problems with the Lectionary Translation”
  • “Music List” • 17th in Ordinary Time (Year C)

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up