• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Priests as Ordinary Ministers of Holy Communion

Fr. David Friel · May 29, 2016

OST PARISHES are celebrating the Solemnity of Corpus Christi today, although the traditional day for the feast was this past Thursday. On this day, we focus on the central object of our worship at Mass, the Real Presence of the Lord in the Most Blessed Sacrament.

Because it is such a wondrous gift, the Church safeguards the Eucharist very carefully. The bishop is charged with the sacred obligation of being the custodian of the Blessed Sacrament in his diocese. The pastor, likewise, bears this responsibility in his parish.

One of the ways the church has conveyed the importance & centrality of the Blessed Sacrament throughout the ages, and the pastor’s obligation to be its custodian, is by establishing the ordained clergy as the ordinary ministers of Holy Communion. This is true even today. Priests and deacons are the ordinary ministers of the precious Body and Blood of Christ. In the sacred liturgy, the priest stands in persona Christi; thus, Christ, in the person of the priest, offers Himself to the faithful who receive. This symbolism is far from empty.

There is a role for the instituted acolyte, as well, whose chief mission is to serve at the altar and help the priest in bringing Holy Communion to the sick and homebound. This ministry originated in the minor orders traditionally conferred upon men progressing toward priestly ordination. Even an instituted acolyte, however, is not considered an ordinary minister of Holy Communion.

It is only by exception, and in cases of true necessity, that the Church permits what are called extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion. These are lay men or women who are specifically commissioned in order to assist with administering Holy Communion at Mass and bringing it to the sick.

The use of extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion, of course, has proliferated in many places beyond what could be considered an exception or a true necessity.

Sometimes, in parish life, things get mixed up and perhaps there are more extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion at a particular Mass than are actually needed. This could be because of a mistake in scheduling or because an extra priest unexpectedly emerges from the sacristy to help. What should be done in such a case?

On several occasions, I have seen priests or deacons in this situation hand ciboria to the extraordinary ministers and then either sit down or busy themselves at the altar, instead of distributing Holy Communion themselves. This should never be done, though, as it constitutes a serious liturgical abuse.

We who are ordinary ministers of Holy Communion must understand this as a duty that is not ours to surrender (except in legitimate cases of illness, feebleness, etc). On this understanding, it becomes clear that, in the situation I have described, the appropriate thing to do is to discreetly make known to one or more of the extraordinary ministers that their assistance is not needed at this Mass. Those who are extraordinary ministers, if they are properly trained, will accept this as perfectly reasonable.

This understanding is expressed beautifully in the introduction to the Order for the Commissioning of Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion:

It is, first of all, the office of the priest and deacon to minister Holy Communion to the faithful who ask to receive it. It is most fitting, therefore, that they give a suitable part of their time to this ministry of their order, depending on the needs of the faithful.

It is the office of an acolyte who has been properly instituted to give Communion as an extraordinary minister when the priest and deacon are absent or impede by sickness, old age, or pastoral ministry or when the number of the faithful at the holy table is so great that the Mass or other service may be unreasonably protracted.

Persons authorized to distribute Holy Communion in special circumstances should be commissioned by the local Ordinary or his delegate.

(Book of Blessings, paragraphs 1871-1873)

That these paragraphs are given to introduce the ceremony by which extraordinary ministers of Holy Communion are commissioned is significant, because it guards against the popular misunderstanding that utilizing extraordinary ministers widely is fundamentally desirable. The most desirable situation is one in which there are sufficient ordinary ministers to bring Holy Communion to the faithful. Whatever personal spiritual growth may come to extraordinary ministers through their service is good (and I acknowledge that such growth is not uncommon), but these good effects do not change the fact that this service by members of the laity is meant to be exceptional.

As the Book of Blessings encourages, priests and deacons should give “a suitable part of their time” to the administration of Holy Communion to the faithful at Mass and at home. It is, after all, a “ministry of their order.” This speaks to the importance of assisting with Communion at all the Sunday Masses and of faithfully visiting “Communion calls” in our parishes.

On this great feast, allow me to conclude with a prayer. This brief prayer is added by local custom in my area to the end of the Divine Praises whenever Benediction is given:

“May the Heart of Jesus, in the Most Blessed Sacrament, be praised, adored, and loved with grateful affection at every moment in all the tabernacles of the world, even until the end of time. Amen.”

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles, Featured Tagged With: Liturgical Abuse Last Updated: December 6, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Fr. David Friel

Ordained in 2011, Father Friel is a priest of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia and serves as Director of Liturgy at Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    “Simplified” Keyboard Accompaniment (PDF)
    I’d much rather hear an organist play a simplified version correctly than listen to wrong notes. I invite you to download this simplified organ accompaniment for hymn #729 in the Father Brébeuf Hymnal. The hymn is “O Jesus Christ, Remember.” This famous text (by Father Caswall) is often married to AURELIA. I’m toying with the idea of creating a whole bunch of these, to help amateur organists. The last one I uploaded was downloaded more than 1,900 times in a matter of hours—so there seems to be interest in such a project.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
    Father Adrian Porter, using the cracher dans la soupe example, did a praiseworthy job explaining the difference between ‘dynamic’ and ‘formal’ translation. This is something Monsignor Ronald Knox explained time and again—yet even now certain parties feign ignorance. I suppose there will always be people who pretend the only ‘valid’ translation of Mitigásti omnem iram tuam; avertísti ab ira indignatiónis tuæ… would be “You mitigated all ire of you; you have averted from your indignation’s ire.” Those who would defend such a translation suffer from an unfortunate malady. One of my professors called it “cognate on the brain.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
    Father Cuthbert Lattey (d. 1954) wrote: “In a large number of cases the ancient Christian versions and some other ancient sources seem to have been based upon a better Hebrew text than that adopted by the rabbis for official use and alone suffered to survive. Sometimes, too, the cognate languages suggest a suitable meaning for which there is little or no support in the comparatively small amount of ancient Hebrew that has survived. The evidence of the metre is also at times so clear as of itself to furnish a strong argument; often it is confirmed by some other considerations. […] The Jewish copyists and their directors, however, seem to have lost the tradition of the metre at an early date, and the meticulous care of the rabbis in preserving their own official and traditional text (the ‘massoretic’ text) came too late, when the mischief had already been done.” • Msgr. Knox adds: “It seems the safest principle to follow the Latin—after all, St. Jerome will sometimes have had a better text than the Massoretes—except on the rare occasions when there is no sense to be extracted from the Vulgate at all.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Reminder” — Month of November (2025)
    On a daily basis, I speak to people who don’t realize we publish a free newsletter (although they’ve followed our blog for years). We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and refuse to run annoying ads. As a result, our mailing list is crucial to our survival. Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

Yet, with all its advantages, the new Missal was published as if it were a work put together by professors, not a phase in a continual growth process. Such a thing never happened before. It is absolutely contrary to the laws of liturgical growth, and it has resulted in the nonsensical notion that Trent and Pius V had “produced” a Missal four hundred years ago.

— Josef Cardinal Ratzinger (1986)

Recent Posts

  • “Simplified” Keyboard Accompaniment (PDF)
  • ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
  • Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
  • Re: The People’s Mass Book (1974)
  • They did a terrible thing

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.