• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

If the Shoe Fits

Andrew R. Motyka · September 11, 2013

Y MOTHER USED TO TELL ME the old cliche, “If the shoe fits, wear it.” Her implied corollary was, “If the shoe doesn’t fit, don’t wear it.” FUN FACT: the implement pictured to the right is known as a “Brannock Device.” My wife and I tossed around what we thought it was called (“Shoe Sizometer” was the front runner), and learned that.

Traditionalists have gotten a bad shake for many years in the Church. They’re always getting lumped in with dissident and schismatic groups, even when they are no such thing. For this reason, along with being unable to celebrate what is now called the Extraordinary Form in many places, Trads (a term I use not derogatorily, but with affection) tend to be a bit defensive about any criticism against them. I’m asking you to let down those defenses for just a few minutes, and consider the following:

Traditionalists have a reputation problem. Some of the criticism against them is perfectly justified, some not, and some is just collateral damage because the critic is recalling previous bad experiences with trads. As a semi-Trad myself (note that, in my effort to escape a label, I’m just creating more labels), I have some suggestions for behavior, especially online, that bastion of rational discourse without any hyperbole or extremism. Ever.

NOTE: I am obviously not addressing all Trads here, hence the title of this post. I am guilty of some of these myself.

One of the biggest problems I’ve noticed with online Trads is that of tone. This is a pretty broad statement to make on a medium like the internet, which has all the subtlety of a chainsaw. What I particularly mean in the case of traditionalists is the tone of superiority. Many comments and posts I read are laced with disdain for the Great Unwashed that are part of the larger Church. Simply put, we don’t need that superiority. If the truth is really on our side, rhetorical bombs just aren’t necessary. Furthermore, that kind of tone acts more to drive people away than to win them over. I know that it’s easier to write another person off because they prefer guitars to polyphony, but condescension certainly doesn’t help the guitar lover, and it will also bleed over into anyone else who reads that discussion later. Remember this the next time you want to call Guitar Guy a heretic. Speaking of which…

Don’t assume the worst in others. I do this one all the time. If a liturgist or a politician is out of line with the norm, I’ll assume, even inwardly, that he truly desires the destruction of the Church. How much more likely is it that that person is taking a different approach, in a different spiritual state in life, or simply uncatechized? As I wrote in one of my first entries, many times a person, even an opinionated one, just doesn’t know. We do a lot more for the cause of tradition by speaking the truth firmly but gently and leaving the person with a good taste, so they remember The Kind (Even if Wrong) Trad instead of just That Jerk. A variation of this approach is…

The desire to see others kicked out of the Church. Some will defend this approach by saying that Benedict XVI predicted a smaller, more faithful Church. Please understand that this was not a desired scenario, but a facing of reality in the postmodern world. If Benedict wanted to rid the Church of the riff-raff, he could have. He didn’t, because that’s not what the Church is for. It’s for all of us, especially the ones who screw up on a consistent basis. I’m not saying that we should change the proclamation of the truth, just that seeking to purge the Church of dissidents is not going to happen, nor is it a Christian solution. Worse yet, I see Trads (only online, never in person, thank the Lord) hoping others end up in hell, either explicitly or implicitly. There is an accurate label for such people: sociopaths.

Overall, what the Trad community needs is a sane public face. No one wants to join a group of angry, bitter reactionaries (just ask most LCWR communities). They want to be a part of something that fulfills them and makes them happy. Also remember that Tradition is a means to an end: the salvation of the whole world through Jesus Christ. If your approach to forwarding the traditional practices of the Church and her liturgy gets in the way of that mission, then you’re doing something wrong.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Andrew R. Motyka

Andrew Motyka is the Archdiocesan Director of Liturgical Music and Cathedral Music for the Archdiocese of Indianapolis.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    Why A “Fugue” Here?
    I believe I know why this plainsong harmonizer created a tiny fugue as the INTRODUCTION to his accompaniment. Take a look (PDF) and tell me your thoughts about what he did on the feast of the Flight of Our Lord Jesus Christ into Egypt (17 February). And now I must go because “tempus fugit” as they say!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 12 October 2025) talks about an ‘irony’ or ‘paradox’ regarding the 1960s switch to a wider use (amplior locus) of vernacular in the liturgy.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Reminder” — Month of October (2025)
    Those who don’t sign up for our free EMAIL NEWSLETTER miss important notifications. Last week, for example, I sent a message about this job opening for a music director paying $65,000 per year plus benefits (plus weddings & funerals). Notice the job description says: “our vision for sacred music is to move from singing at Mass to truly singing the Mass wherein … especially the propers, ordinaries, and dialogues are given their proper place.” Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “American Catholic Hymnal” (1991)
    The American Catholic Hymnal, with IMPRIMATUR granted (25 April 1991) by the Archdiocese of Chicago, is like a compendium of every horrible idea from the 1980s. Imagine being forced to stand all through Communion (even afterwards) when those self-same ‘enlightened’ liturgists moved the SEQUENCE before the Alleluia to make sure congregations wouldn’t have to stand during it. (Even worse, everything about the SEQUENCE—including its name—means it should follow the Alleluia.) And imagine endlessly repeating “Alleluia” during Holy Communion at every single Mass. It was all part of an effort to convince people that Holy Communion was historically a procession (which it wasn’t).
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Canonic” • Ralph Vaughan Williams
    Fifty years ago, Dr. Theodore Marier made available this clever arrangement (PDF) of “Come down, O love divine” by P. R. Dietterich. The melody was composed in 1906 by Ralph Vaughan Williams (d. 1958) and named in honor of of his birthplace: DOWN AMPNEY. The arrangement isn’t a strict canon, but it does remind one of a canon since the pipe organ employs “points of imitation.” The melody and text are #709 in the Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Did they simplify these hymn harmonies?
    Choirs love to sing the famous & splendid tune called “INNSBRUCK.” Looking through a (Roman Catholic) German hymnal printed in 1952, I discovered what appears to be a simplified version of that hymn. In other words, their harmonization is much less complex than the version found in the Saint Jean de Brébeuf Hymnal (which is suitable for singing by SATB choir). Please download their 1952 harmonization (PDF) and let me know your thoughts. I really like the groovy Germanic INTRODUCTION they added.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“In the Latin Church the pipe organ is to be held in high esteem, for it is the traditional musical instrument which adds a wonderful splendor to the Church’s ceremonies and powerfully lifts up man’s mind to God and to higher things.”

— Vatican II Council

Recent Posts

  • The Real Miracle of Gregorian Chant
  • Why A “Fugue” Here?
  • “Three Reasons To Shun Bad Hymns” • Daniel B. Marshall
  • “Puzzling Comment” • By A Respected FSSP Priest
  • New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.