• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

If the Shoe Fits

Andrew R. Motyka · September 11, 2013

Y MOTHER USED TO TELL ME the old cliche, “If the shoe fits, wear it.” Her implied corollary was, “If the shoe doesn’t fit, don’t wear it.” FUN FACT: the implement pictured to the right is known as a “Brannock Device.” My wife and I tossed around what we thought it was called (“Shoe Sizometer” was the front runner), and learned that.

Traditionalists have gotten a bad shake for many years in the Church. They’re always getting lumped in with dissident and schismatic groups, even when they are no such thing. For this reason, along with being unable to celebrate what is now called the Extraordinary Form in many places, Trads (a term I use not derogatorily, but with affection) tend to be a bit defensive about any criticism against them. I’m asking you to let down those defenses for just a few minutes, and consider the following:

Traditionalists have a reputation problem. Some of the criticism against them is perfectly justified, some not, and some is just collateral damage because the critic is recalling previous bad experiences with trads. As a semi-Trad myself (note that, in my effort to escape a label, I’m just creating more labels), I have some suggestions for behavior, especially online, that bastion of rational discourse without any hyperbole or extremism. Ever.

NOTE: I am obviously not addressing all Trads here, hence the title of this post. I am guilty of some of these myself.

One of the biggest problems I’ve noticed with online Trads is that of tone. This is a pretty broad statement to make on a medium like the internet, which has all the subtlety of a chainsaw. What I particularly mean in the case of traditionalists is the tone of superiority. Many comments and posts I read are laced with disdain for the Great Unwashed that are part of the larger Church. Simply put, we don’t need that superiority. If the truth is really on our side, rhetorical bombs just aren’t necessary. Furthermore, that kind of tone acts more to drive people away than to win them over. I know that it’s easier to write another person off because they prefer guitars to polyphony, but condescension certainly doesn’t help the guitar lover, and it will also bleed over into anyone else who reads that discussion later. Remember this the next time you want to call Guitar Guy a heretic. Speaking of which…

Don’t assume the worst in others. I do this one all the time. If a liturgist or a politician is out of line with the norm, I’ll assume, even inwardly, that he truly desires the destruction of the Church. How much more likely is it that that person is taking a different approach, in a different spiritual state in life, or simply uncatechized? As I wrote in one of my first entries, many times a person, even an opinionated one, just doesn’t know. We do a lot more for the cause of tradition by speaking the truth firmly but gently and leaving the person with a good taste, so they remember The Kind (Even if Wrong) Trad instead of just That Jerk. A variation of this approach is…

The desire to see others kicked out of the Church. Some will defend this approach by saying that Benedict XVI predicted a smaller, more faithful Church. Please understand that this was not a desired scenario, but a facing of reality in the postmodern world. If Benedict wanted to rid the Church of the riff-raff, he could have. He didn’t, because that’s not what the Church is for. It’s for all of us, especially the ones who screw up on a consistent basis. I’m not saying that we should change the proclamation of the truth, just that seeking to purge the Church of dissidents is not going to happen, nor is it a Christian solution. Worse yet, I see Trads (only online, never in person, thank the Lord) hoping others end up in hell, either explicitly or implicitly. There is an accurate label for such people: sociopaths.

Overall, what the Trad community needs is a sane public face. No one wants to join a group of angry, bitter reactionaries (just ask most LCWR communities). They want to be a part of something that fulfills them and makes them happy. Also remember that Tradition is a means to an end: the salvation of the whole world through Jesus Christ. If your approach to forwarding the traditional practices of the Church and her liturgy gets in the way of that mission, then you’re doing something wrong.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Andrew R. Motyka

Andrew Motyka is the Archdiocesan Director of Liturgical Music and Cathedral Music for the Archdiocese of Indianapolis.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    “Offertory” at Catholic Funerals
    I have argued that the OFFERTORY—at least in its ancient form—is more of a responsory than an antiphon. The 1962 Missal specifically calls it “Antiphona ad Offertorium.” From now on, I plan to use this beautiful setting (PDF) at funerals, since it cleverly inserts themes from the absolution of the body. Tons more research needs to be done on the OFFERTORY, which often is a ‘patchwork’ stitching together various beginnings and endings of biblical verses. For instance, if you examine the ancient verses for Dómine, vivífica me (30th Sunday in Ordinary Time) you’ll discover this being done in a most perplexing way. Rebecca Maloy published a very expensive book on the OFFERTORY, but it was a disappointment. Indeed, I can’t think of a single valuable insight contained in her book. What a missed opportunity!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “In Paradisum” • Gregorian Chant
    As a RECESSIONAL on All Souls’ Day (November 2nd), we will sing In Paradísum Dedúcant Te Ángeli (PDF). When it comes to Gregorian Chant, this is one of the most popular “songs.” Frankly, all the prayers and chants from the traditional REQUIEM MASS (Missa exsequialis or Missa pro defunctis) are incredibly powerful and never should’ve been scuttled. Click here to hear “In Paradisum” in a recording I made this afternoon. Professor Louis Bouyer spoke of the way Bugnini “scuttled the office of the dead” in this fascinating excerpt from his memoirs. In his book, La riforma litugica (1983), Bugnini bragged—in quite a shameful way—about eliminating the ancient funeral texts, and even admitted those venerable texts were “beloved” (his word) by Catholics.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Music List” • All Souls (2 November)
    Readers have expressed interest in perusing the ORDER OF MUSIC I’ve prepared for 2 November 2025, which is the Commemoration of All the Faithful Departed (“All Souls”). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. As always, the Responsorial Psalm, Gospel Acclamation, and Mass Propers for this Sunday are conveniently stored at the top-notch feasts website alongside the official texts in Latin. In my humble opinion, it’s weird to have the feast of All Saints on a Sunday. No wonder the close associate of Pope Saint Paul VI said the revised KALENDAR was “the handiwork of a trio of maniacs.” However, I can’t deny that sometimes the sacred liturgy consists of elements that are seemingly contradictory: e.g. the Mode 7 “De Profúndis” ALLELUIA, or the Mode 8 “Dulce lignum” ALLELUIA on the various ancient feasts of the Holy Cross (3 May, 14 September, and so on).
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 12 October 2025) talks about an ‘irony’ or ‘paradox’ regarding the 1960s switch to a wider use (amplior locus) of vernacular in the liturgy.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“From the responses received, it is thus clear that by far the greater number of bishops feel that the present discipline [Communion on the tongue and not in the hand] should not be changed at all—indeed, that if it were changed, this would be offensive to the sensibility and spiritual appreciation of these bishops and of most of the faithful.”

— Sacred Congregation for Divine Worship (29 May 1969)

Recent Posts

  • “Reader Feedback” • 5 November 2025
  • Never Work For A Priest Or Bishop Who Believes Sacred Music Should Be “Entertainment”
  • When Pilgrims Sing, the World Disappears
  • “Offertory” at Catholic Funerals
  • “In Paradisum” • Gregorian Chant

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.