• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Blackley’s Sunday Mass Propers Now Available as Free PDF

Patrick Williams · February 25, 2023

OHN BLACKLEY has recently published a 503-page PDF titled Laon 239: Chant Transcriptions in Proportional Rhythm, English & Latin, which may be of interest to many readers. His older articles, “On Realizing Gregorian Chant” and “Rhythm and Nuance in Chant,” are archived here. In this new volume commemorating the 50th anniversary of his Schola Antiqua, Blackley reveals a bit more about himself than I remember from his previous writings, namely that he belonged to a Catholic religious order for some time, the Christian Brothers, and conducted according to the Solesmes method while in the order (p. 481) and that he apparently now identifies more closely with “those of us on the outskirts of Christianity” than “those within Christianity” (p. 485). He writes, “Back in New York City, decades ago, we sang weekly Masses not necessarily as believers but as appreciators of Poetry [sic] in music & texts. Masses were sung through the liturgical year to celebrate a mythos of the rabbi Jesus in history & mystically” (p. 4). Now that that cat is out of the bag, let’s consider his technical approach to the chant.


Gradual for Maundy Thursday (p. 189)

Literalism and Syncopation • Blackley transcribes Laon 239 literally—perhaps too literally. In reference to David Hiley, Blackley writes, “Not he nor any semiologist nor anyone associated with Solesmes will face what is obvious among the shapes of the ninth-& tenth-century written musical signs: the ordinary sung note is a long that is divisible!” (p. 500), which is precisely the position I also articulated in a recent post. Unfortunately, Blackley himself has also failed to face something obvious in the adiastematic neumes, namely, that short notes generally appear only in pairs or other even-numbered quantities, with relatively few exceptions. Although he reproduces the significative letters such as c, t, and a, Blackley simply writes a short note in some instances where other editors, considering the evidence of tenth-century manuscripts besides Laon 239, prefer a weak beginning (initio debilis) grace note. The plain short note, sung as written, results in a ternary rhythmic group. Rather than a sort of holdover from the Solesmes method, such ternary groupings represent willingness to admit disruption of the tactus equal to one long note and, more broadly speaking, an unnecessary degree of syncopation (which can be heard in Schola Antiqua’s recordings). The work of Jan van Biezen, whose Rhythm, Meter and Tempo in Gregorian Chant Blackley includes in his bibliography, offers a corrective in regard to these apparent syncopations, with an approach that incorporates Cardine’s insights into a mensuralist framework consistent with the oldest extant sources and the medieval writers. Elsewhere, when a weak beginning note is clearly indicated in the Laon codex itself, Blackley uses a round note (e.g., at terra on p. 34 and figures e, j, k, l, and n on p. 478).

Worksheet for Midnight Mass (p. 42)

Curiosities • Blackley includes some drafts, comparative tables, and duplex editions that result in a more interesting presentation than merely including the handwritten performing editions in both Latin and English. From a few cursory glances, I note that an elegant style of early modern English is used, but with Adonai instead of Lord in many instances where Domine represents the Tetragrammaton; for example, “Thou hast shown unto me the way of life: thou wilt fill my soul with joy in the sight of thy face, Adonai” (p. 93). My only complaint with the notation itself is the inconsistent use of the custos or guide note. In some chants, it is omitted altogether; elsewhere, it appears at the right margin, where it ought to be, or at the right edge of unjustified musical lines. I also question his claim (as well as Jan van Biezen’s) that each syllable of psalm recitation in the Divine Office should have the value of a long note (p. 12), just like the introit verses of the Mass. Van Biezen’s translator, Kevin M. Rooney, mentions in a footnote that

Actually, the Commemoratio brevis calls for an exception in the canticles, the Benedictus and Magnificat, “which are sung so slowly that their antiphon should follow at the same tempo” (tr. Terrence Bailey, Commemoratio brevis de tonis et psalmis modulandis, p. 107). Since the psalm verses of Introit and Communion show the same solemnity of decoration as the canticles, it follows that they too are to be sung at the same tempo as their antiphons, i.e. half the tempo of the normal psalm verses. (“The Rhythm of Gregorian Chant” in Rhythm, Meter and Tempo in Gregorian Chant, p. 41)

Communion for Easter Sunday, in English (p. 241)

Thank you, sir! • As in his previous writings, besides the musical content, Blackley offers equally valuable personal anecdotes and impressions. On p. 491, he mentions how Vollaerts and probably Murray as well were pressured by their superiors to stop teaching the proportional rhythm of the Middle Ages—which is a good reminder that we need ordinary lay people involved in this important work. Blackley’s editions are clearly the result of years of painstaking labor. I wholeheartedly commend him for making them available to the world for free. I conclude this post with his own words stressing the importance of musicality in addition to accurate performing editions: “Transcriptions are best done by those who both sing & conduct and enjoy studying minute neumatic details & problems—all this while making sure that the horizontal musical line of each song is their main musical concern” (p. 52).

Fr. Jan Vollaerts, S.J. (left) and Dom Gregory Murray, O.S.B.
Pioneers of the Restoration of Proportional Rhythm in the Mid-20th Century

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: February 25, 2023

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    Why A “Fugue” Here?
    I believe I know why this plainsong harmonizer created a tiny fugue as the INTRODUCTION to his accompaniment. Take a look (PDF) and tell me your thoughts about what he did on the feast of the Flight of Our Lord Jesus Christ into Egypt (17 February). And now I must go because “tempus fugit” as they say!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 12 October 2025) talks about an ‘irony’ or ‘paradox’ regarding the 1960s switch to a wider use (amplior locus) of vernacular in the liturgy.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Reminder” — Month of October (2025)
    Those who don’t sign up for our free EMAIL NEWSLETTER miss important notifications. Last week, for example, I sent a message about this job opening for a music director paying $65,000 per year plus benefits (plus weddings & funerals). Notice the job description says: “our vision for sacred music is to move from singing at Mass to truly singing the Mass wherein … especially the propers, ordinaries, and dialogues are given their proper place.” Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “American Catholic Hymnal” (1991)
    The American Catholic Hymnal, with IMPRIMATUR granted (25 April 1991) by the Archdiocese of Chicago, is like a compendium of every horrible idea from the 1980s. Imagine being forced to stand all through Communion (even afterwards) when those self-same ‘enlightened’ liturgists moved the SEQUENCE before the Alleluia to make sure congregations wouldn’t have to stand during it. (Even worse, everything about the SEQUENCE—including its name—means it should follow the Alleluia.) And imagine endlessly repeating “Alleluia” during Holy Communion at every single Mass. It was all part of an effort to convince people that Holy Communion was historically a procession (which it wasn’t).
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Canonic” • Ralph Vaughan Williams
    Fifty years ago, Dr. Theodore Marier made available this clever arrangement (PDF) of “Come down, O love divine” by P. R. Dietterich. The melody was composed in 1906 by Ralph Vaughan Williams (d. 1958) and named in honor of of his birthplace: DOWN AMPNEY. The arrangement isn’t a strict canon, but it does remind one of a canon since the pipe organ employs “points of imitation.” The melody and text are #709 in the Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Did they simplify these hymn harmonies?
    Choirs love to sing the famous & splendid tune called “INNSBRUCK.” Looking through a (Roman Catholic) German hymnal printed in 1952, I discovered what appears to be a simplified version of that hymn. In other words, their harmonization is much less complex than the version found in the Saint Jean de Brébeuf Hymnal (which is suitable for singing by SATB choir). Please download their 1952 harmonization (PDF) and let me know your thoughts. I really like the groovy Germanic INTRODUCTION they added.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“The sun’s disc did not remain immobile. This was not the sparkling of a heavenly body, for it spun round on itself in a mad whirl, when suddenly a clamor was heard from all the people. The sun, whirling, seemed to loosen itself from the firmament and advance threateningly upon the earth as if to crush us with its huge fiery weight. The sensation during those moments was terrible.”

— ‘Dr. Almeida Garrett, professor of natural sciences at the University of Coimbra (1917)’

Recent Posts

  • The Real Miracle of Gregorian Chant
  • Why A “Fugue” Here?
  • “Three Reasons To Shun Bad Hymns” • Daniel B. Marshall
  • “Puzzling Comment” • By A Respected FSSP Priest
  • New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.