• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

“What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too…” Pope Benedict XVI (7 July 2007)

  • Our Team
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Saint Antoine Daniel KYRIALE
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
  • Donate
Views from the Choir Loft

Practical Reflections on the Restored Order

Fr. David Friel · January 3, 2021

ORE THAN likely, readers of this blog will be familiar with the term “restored order.” It refers to the administration of the Sacraments of Initiation in their original order (Baptism, Confirmation, Holy Eucharist), rather than in the ordering that became common in the early twentieth-century (Baptism, Holy Eucharist, Confirmation). 1 Desire for the “restored order” is one of the happy, but all-too-infrequent, points of agreement between liturgical progressives and liturgical conservatives.

I have previously shared my own thoughts in favor of the “restored order” (here). Several US bishops who have adopted the “restored order” have also explained their own rationales (see here, here, and here). Today, I would like to draw attention to an important new article by Bishop Larry Silva of Honolulu, HI, which addresses very practically why he made the decision in 2015 to implement the “restored order.”

Bishop Silva’s article appears in the latest issue of a new periodical, The International Journal of Evangelization and Catechetics. 2 The journal includes a Studia section of academic articles and a Practica section of pastoral pieces, along with a collection of book reviews. Silva’s article is found in the Practica section.

Implementing the “restored order” in Honolulu, the bishop admits from the outset, was not his own idea. It was, rather, an idea presented to him by several members of his staff.

Why did he decide to pursue this recommendation? Silva offers two reasons: “It is clear that the Church intended this order from the beginning; and it puts the emphasis on God’s action and grace rather than our own.” 3

The first of these stated reasons is easily proven. There is no question that Baptism-Confirmation-Holy Eucharist is both the original order of these Sacraments and the dominant order throughout nearly the whole of Church history. With respect to the second reason, Silva argues that the modern conception of Confirmation as a Sacrament of Christian maturity (a sort of Catholic bar/bat mitzvah) unwittingly feeds a consumerist mentality, wherein the emphasis falls too heavily on what the recipient of the Sacrament is doing, rather than on what God is doing.

The bishop explains:

It was primarily to recognize that God is the first one who moves toward us with his love that I decided to celebrate the sacraments of initiation in the Diocese of Honolulu by restoring their original order: Baptism, Confirmation, and First Communion. I pray this restoration of the original order of these sacraments will fulfill the Lord’s dream of having a Church he can love as his own Bride, who serves as he serves, and gives her life as he gives his life. And this is not only a Church of mature adults, but one that includes even little children, who in the power of the Holy Spirit give witness to Jesus.

The article explains, step-by-step, how the Diocese of Honolulu went about enacting this change over a three-year period. Bishop Silva does not ignore the common objections to the “restored order,” especially the reasonable fear that it might decimate parish religious education programs. This was one of the bishop’s own fears, and he says that his diocese committed to a twofold approach so as to avoid the ruination of religious education programs. The first step was to move Confirmation before First Communion (at the same liturgical celebration), and the second step was to strengthen diocesan and parochial ministry to youth.

Any bishop or diocese contemplating a shift to the “restored order” would do well to read Bishop Silva’s article, which includes an entire section entitled “The Nuts and Bolts of the Transition.” 4

At present, 13 dioceses in the United States have adopted the “restored order,” all in the last quarter-century. These include: Saginaw, MI (1995), Great Falls-Billings, MT (1996), Portland, ME (1997), Spokane, WA (1998), Fargo, ND (2002), Gaylord, MI (2003), Tyler, TX (2005), Phoenix, AZ (2005), Honolulu, HI (2015), Denver, CO (2015), Manchester, NH (2017), Springfield, IL (2017), and Gallup, NM (2019). There are also two US dioceses (Greensburg, PA and Marquette, MI) that adopted the “restored order” for a time but have since reverted to the twentieth-century practice. (These data are taken from the National Catholic Register.)

For those who are interested in a fuller discussion of the merits of the “restored order,” I would direct your attention to two particular works:

1. Paul Turner, “Benedict XVI, and the Sequence of the Sacraments of Initiation,” Worship 82, no. 2 (2008): 132-140.

2. Liam G. Walsh, Sacraments of Initiation: A Theology of Rite, Word, and Life (Chicago: Hillenbrand Books, 2011).

I cannot recommend Bishop Silva’s article highly enough (periodical available for purchase here). It gives a rich account of the theological rationale for the “restored order,” but not to the neglect of the important pastoral issues associated with moving in this direction. The article conveys the wisdom of a pastor who, with the help of his staff, became convinced that the “restored order” makes sense and developed a pastoral plan for its fruitful implementation.


NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   Although the practice of Baptism-Confirmation-Holy Eucharist only became widespread following Pope St. Pius X’s Quam singulari, this novelty had developed in certain places (e.g., in France) as early as the 19th century.

2   See Larry Silva, “Reflections on the Restoration of the Original Order of the Sacraments of Initiation,” IJEC 1, no. 2 (Fall 2020): 215-222. This issue of the journal is available for purchase here.

3   Silva, “Reflections on the Restoration of the Original Order of the Sacraments of Initiation,” 215.

4   Silva, “Reflections on the Restoration of the Original Order of the Sacraments of Initiation,” 220-222.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Follow the Discussion on Facebook

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Restored Order Last Updated: January 3, 2021

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Fr. David Friel

Ordained in 2011, Father Friel served as Parochial Vicar at Saint Anselm Church in Northeast Philly before earning a doctorate in liturgical theology at The Catholic University of America. He presently serves as Vocation Director for the Archdiocese of Philadelphia and teaches liturgy at St. Charles Borromeo Seminary.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Quick Thoughts

    Vespers Booklet (4th Sunday of Lent)
    The organ accompaniment booklet (24 pages) which I created for the 4th Sunday of Lent (“Lætare Sunday”) may now be downloaded, for those who desire such a thing.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Vespers Booklet, 3rd Sunday of Lent
    The organ accompaniment I created for the 3rd Sunday of Lent (“Extraordinary Form”) may now be downloaded, if anyone is interested in this.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Weeping For Joy! (We Hope!)
    Listening to this Easter Alleluia—an SATB arrangement I made twenty years ago based on the work of Monsignor Jules Van Nuffel—one of our readers left this comment: “I get tears in my eyes each time I sing to this hymn.” I hope this person is weeping for joy!
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“The recitation of the Office of the Dead, the Christmas Office, the spectacle of the days of Holy Week, the sublime chant of the Exultet, beside which the most intoxicating accents of Sophocles and Pindar seemed to me to be insignificant—all of this overwhelmed me with respect and joy, with gratitude, repentance, and adoration!”

— Paul Claudel (1913)

Recent Posts

  • Three (3) Cheerful Items • “Sacred Music Revolution”
  • Who Should Sing the Passion? What about Tracts?
  • “Seventy-Three (73) Changes” • Which Pope Pius XII Made to Holy Week
  • Three (3) Tricks Every Choir Director Should Learn
  • Question: “How Do You Read The Official Edition?”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2023 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.