• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

We’re a 501(c)3 public charity established in 2006. We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and run no advertisements. We exist solely by the generosity of small donors.

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Practical Reflections on the Restored Order

Fr. David Friel · January 3, 2021

ORE THAN likely, readers of this blog will be familiar with the term “restored order.” It refers to the administration of the Sacraments of Initiation in their original order (Baptism, Confirmation, Holy Eucharist), rather than in the ordering that became common in the early twentieth-century (Baptism, Holy Eucharist, Confirmation). 1 Desire for the “restored order” is one of the happy, but all-too-infrequent, points of agreement between liturgical progressives and liturgical conservatives.

I have previously shared my own thoughts in favor of the “restored order” (here). Several US bishops who have adopted the “restored order” have also explained their own rationales (see here, here, and here). Today, I would like to draw attention to an important new article by Bishop Larry Silva of Honolulu, HI, which addresses very practically why he made the decision in 2015 to implement the “restored order.”

Bishop Silva’s article appears in the latest issue of a new periodical, The International Journal of Evangelization and Catechetics. 2 The journal includes a Studia section of academic articles and a Practica section of pastoral pieces, along with a collection of book reviews. Silva’s article is found in the Practica section.

Implementing the “restored order” in Honolulu, the bishop admits from the outset, was not his own idea. It was, rather, an idea presented to him by several members of his staff.

Why did he decide to pursue this recommendation? Silva offers two reasons: “It is clear that the Church intended this order from the beginning; and it puts the emphasis on God’s action and grace rather than our own.” 3

The first of these stated reasons is easily proven. There is no question that Baptism-Confirmation-Holy Eucharist is both the original order of these Sacraments and the dominant order throughout nearly the whole of Church history. With respect to the second reason, Silva argues that the modern conception of Confirmation as a Sacrament of Christian maturity (a sort of Catholic bar/bat mitzvah) unwittingly feeds a consumerist mentality, wherein the emphasis falls too heavily on what the recipient of the Sacrament is doing, rather than on what God is doing.

The bishop explains:

It was primarily to recognize that God is the first one who moves toward us with his love that I decided to celebrate the sacraments of initiation in the Diocese of Honolulu by restoring their original order: Baptism, Confirmation, and First Communion. I pray this restoration of the original order of these sacraments will fulfill the Lord’s dream of having a Church he can love as his own Bride, who serves as he serves, and gives her life as he gives his life. And this is not only a Church of mature adults, but one that includes even little children, who in the power of the Holy Spirit give witness to Jesus.

The article explains, step-by-step, how the Diocese of Honolulu went about enacting this change over a three-year period. Bishop Silva does not ignore the common objections to the “restored order,” especially the reasonable fear that it might decimate parish religious education programs. This was one of the bishop’s own fears, and he says that his diocese committed to a twofold approach so as to avoid the ruination of religious education programs. The first step was to move Confirmation before First Communion (at the same liturgical celebration), and the second step was to strengthen diocesan and parochial ministry to youth.

Any bishop or diocese contemplating a shift to the “restored order” would do well to read Bishop Silva’s article, which includes an entire section entitled “The Nuts and Bolts of the Transition.” 4

At present, 13 dioceses in the United States have adopted the “restored order,” all in the last quarter-century. These include: Saginaw, MI (1995), Great Falls-Billings, MT (1996), Portland, ME (1997), Spokane, WA (1998), Fargo, ND (2002), Gaylord, MI (2003), Tyler, TX (2005), Phoenix, AZ (2005), Honolulu, HI (2015), Denver, CO (2015), Manchester, NH (2017), Springfield, IL (2017), and Gallup, NM (2019). There are also two US dioceses (Greensburg, PA and Marquette, MI) that adopted the “restored order” for a time but have since reverted to the twentieth-century practice. (These data are taken from the National Catholic Register.)

For those who are interested in a fuller discussion of the merits of the “restored order,” I would direct your attention to two particular works:

1. Paul Turner, “Benedict XVI, and the Sequence of the Sacraments of Initiation,” Worship 82, no. 2 (2008): 132-140.

2. Liam G. Walsh, Sacraments of Initiation: A Theology of Rite, Word, and Life (Chicago: Hillenbrand Books, 2011).

I cannot recommend Bishop Silva’s article highly enough (periodical available for purchase here). It gives a rich account of the theological rationale for the “restored order,” but not to the neglect of the important pastoral issues associated with moving in this direction. The article conveys the wisdom of a pastor who, with the help of his staff, became convinced that the “restored order” makes sense and developed a pastoral plan for its fruitful implementation.


NOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE:

1   Although the practice of Baptism-Confirmation-Holy Eucharist only became widespread following Pope St. Pius X’s Quam singulari, this novelty had developed in certain places (e.g., in France) as early as the 19th century.

2   See Larry Silva, “Reflections on the Restoration of the Original Order of the Sacraments of Initiation,” IJEC 1, no. 2 (Fall 2020): 215-222. This issue of the journal is available for purchase here.

3   Silva, “Reflections on the Restoration of the Original Order of the Sacraments of Initiation,” 215.

4   Silva, “Reflections on the Restoration of the Original Order of the Sacraments of Initiation,” 220-222.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Follow the Discussion on Facebook

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Restored Order Last Updated: January 3, 2021

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Fr. David Friel

Ordained in 2011, Father Friel is a priest of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia and serves as Director of Liturgy at Saint Charles Borromeo Seminary. —(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    Luis Martínez Must Go!
    Sevilla Cathedral (entry dated 13 December 1564): The chapter orders Luis Martínez, a cathedral chaplain, to stay away from the choirbook-stand when the rest of the singers gather around it to sing polyphony—the reason being that “he throws the others out of tune.” [Excerpt from “The Life of Father Francisco Guerrero.”]
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Urgent! • We Desperately Need Funds!
    A few days ago, the president of Corpus Christi Watershed posted this urgent appeal for funds. Please help us make sure we’re never forced to place our content behind a paywall. We feel it’s crucial that 100% of our content remains free to everyone. We’re a tiny 501(c)3 public charity, entirely dependent upon the generosity of small donors. We have no endowment and no major donors. We run no advertisements and have no savings. We beg you to consider donating $4.00 per month. Thank you!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Booklet of Eucharistic Hymns” (16 pages)
    I was asked to create a booklet for my parish to use during our CORPUS CHRISTI PROCESSION on 22 June 2025. Would you be willing to look over the DRAFT BOOKLET (16 pages) I came up with? I tried to include a variety of hymns: some have a refrain; some are in major, others in minor; some are metered, others are plainsong; some are in Spanish, some are in Latin, but most are in English. Normally, we’d use the Brébeuf Hymnal—but we can’t risk having our congregation carry those heavy books all over the city to various churches.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“Gregorian chant is the sacred chant, proper and principal of the Roman Church. Therefore, not only can it be used in all liturgical actions, but unless there are mitigating circumstances, it is preferable to use it instead of other kinds of sacred music.”

— §16, De Musica Sacra (1958)

Recent Posts

  • Luis Martínez Must Go!
  • Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
  • PDF Download • “Gospel Acclamation” for 29 June (Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul, Apostles)
  • “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
  • Available! • Free Rehearsal Videos for Agnus Dei “Mille Regretz” after Gombert (d. 1560)

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up