• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

“What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too…” Pope Benedict XVI (7 July 2007)

  • Our Team
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Saint Antoine Daniel KYRIALE
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
  • Donate
Views from the Choir Loft

Repeating Repertoire? • Christopher Mueller

Christopher Mueller · March 30, 2020

I find myself against and for it.

N the “against” column is the experience of my first position as a director of church music: I succeeded a beloved but often ill choirmaster who in his last two years was more ill than well, the result of which was that the choir would often show up to sing a Sunday Mass and discover they had no choirmaster that day. They had a modest number of pieces on standby for just such a situation, pieces which got repeated airplay during that time. When I took over, the singers were ready to move on from that handful of somewhat overused motets and try their hand at new repertory. To my everlasting good fortune, there was a musicologist who had been singing in the choir for awhile and who took it upon himself to plan the music for my first couple of years, with the self-prescribed rubric of never repeating a piece during the choral season. The singers took well to this unending variety, I enjoyed the challenge of preparing new pieces each week and discovering the immense variety of musical options, and I came to the conclusion that as there are no repeated liturgies during the year, there should thus be no repeated choral motets. That is, every liturgy has its own unique set of proper texts (both musical, e.g. Introit, Offertory, etc., and priestly, e.g. the Collect, the Super-Oblata, etc.), as well as the readings designated in the Lectionary, and so care should be exercised in choosing repertory that reflects or extends the liturgical texts already provided by the church; since those texts vary from one Mass to the next, so too should the music vary from one Mass to the next.

Further in the “against” column is the ever-growing supply of choral repertory available for free online, mostly older music in the public domain. There is so much lovely and liturgically appropriate material that it seems a shame to repeat a piece when there is something else of equal beauty and fittingness available. Not only do I try not to repeat music during the choral year, but I also try to repeat very little music from one year to the next, which wouldn’t be possible without the plethora of online resources.

One might even marshall a theological argument in the “against” column, in that St. Augustine described the beauty of the divine as “ever ancient, ever new.” The liturgy is a great gift which is supposed to both reflect and direct us to the beauty of God, and so employing the music of centuries past may well qualify as “ancient,” while an ongoing exploration of unfamiliar repertory satisfies the criterion of “new.” (If a piece has never been heard at the parish before, it’s “new” no matter how ancient it is.)

I decided this year to carry this practice over into my organ repertory, as well, playing a different piece as postlude each Sunday, dating back to the start of Advent. (Of course, this is slightly more manageable due to the six-week break during Lent, where there are no organ postludes; but then it’ll be offset during the summer when the choir takes a couple months off, while the organ—and attendant postludes—will still be required!)


N the other hand, the “for” column is not bereft: there are a few times of year when there are lots of different liturgies in a short amount of time—e.g. the four different Christmas Masses in under 24 hours’ time, or the liturgies of the Triduum and Easter Day, comprising four (or more) unique liturgies in just four days. There is much choral music that could be used at more than one Christmas liturgy; this makes rehearsal time extra-efficient, when a piece rehearsed once is to be sung twice or more. Contrarily, there’s not much musical overlap from one to the next of the Triduum liturgies, but the sheer quantity of music to be sung recommends that there might at least be some repertory repeated year to year, so that the choir (which does not have an infinite amount of rehearsal time!) may be well-prepared for all the music it needs to sing during that stressful (but so wondrously rewarding) marathon. Hurrah for institutional memory!

Additionally, and I’m sure I’m not the only one to feel this way: certain celebrations don’t feel right without “that piece.” Christmas seems imperfectly celebrated without Victoria’s O magnum mysterium, for example, nor Easter without Lyra Davidica’s Easter Hymn (“Jesus Christ is Ris’n Today”). Whenever I have the forces, I do Lhéritier’s stunning, hauntingly beautiful Surrexit pastor bonus for Easter IV (Good Shepherd Sunday), and I know of more than one church that repeats the Fauré Requiem each year at the Mass of All Souls’ Day. There is certainly room for the choir’s favorite pieces, or the parish’s.  (I also repeat a handful of my own compositions year-to-year.)

So I find myself mostly against repetition, but not dogmatically so. I try to vary the music throughout the choral season—and it’s always wonderful to discover new and beautiful liturgical music—but there is definitely prudence in recycling some choral repertory from one year to the next. Strike whatever balance best serves you and your singers and whoever else (if anyone—pastor? liturgical committee?) has a voice in shaping your parish’s music, while not neglecting the opening of Psalms 96 & 98: sing a new song unto the Lord!

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Follow the Discussion on Facebook

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Repeating Repertoire Last Updated: March 30, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Christopher Mueller

Christopher Mueller is a conductor and composer who aims to write beautiful music out of gratitude to God, Author of all beauty.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Quick Thoughts

    Hymn by Cardinal Newman
    During the season of Septuagesima, we will be using this hymn by Cardinal Newman, which employs both Latin and English. (Readers probably know that Cardinal Newman was one of the world's experts when it comes to Lingua Latina.) The final verse contains a beautiful soprano descant. Father Louis Bouyer—famous theologian, close friend of Pope Paul VI, and architect of post-conciliar reforms—wrote thus vis-à-vis the elimination of Septuagesima: “I prefer to say nothing, or very little, about the new calendar, the handiwork of a trio of maniacs who suppressed (with no good reason) Septuagesima and the Octave of Pentecost and who scattered three quarters of the Saints higgledy-piddledy, all based on notions of their own devising!”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Introit • Candlemas (2 February)
    “Candlemas” • Our choir sang on February 2nd, and here's a live recording of the beautiful INTROIT: Suscépimus Deus. We had very little time to rehearse, but I think it has some very nice moments. I promise that by the 8th Sunday after Pentecost it will be perfect! (That Introit is repeated on the 8th Sunday after Pentecost.) We still need to improve, but we're definitely on the right track!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Simplified Antiphons • “Candlemas”
    Anyone who desires simplified antiphons (“psalm tone versions”) for 2 February, the Feast of the Purification—which is also known as “Candlemas” or the Feast of the Presentation—may freely download them. The texts of the antiphons are quite beautiful. From “Lumen Ad Revelatiónem Géntium” you can hear a live excerpt (Mp3). I'm not a fan of chant in octaves, but we had such limited time to rehearse, it seemed the best choice. After all, everyone should have an opportunity to learn “Lumen Ad Revelatiónem Géntium,” which summarizes Candlemas.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

The representative Protestant collection, entitled “Hymns, Ancient and Modern”—in substance a compromise between the various sections of conflicting religious thought in the Establishment—is a typical instance. That collection is indebted to Catholic writers for a large fractional part of its contents. If the hymns be estimated which are taken from Catholic sources, directly or imitatively, the greater and more valuable part of its contents owes its origin to the Church.

— Orby Shipley (1884)

Recent Posts

  • PDF Download • Symposium Kyrie Revealed
  • Did Pope Francis Just Publicly Rebuke the Prefect of Divine Worship?
  • Gregorian Rhythm Wars • “The Normal Syllabic Value” (6 Feb 2023)
  • Hymn by Cardinal Newman
  • Church Music Shouldn’t Be “Headache-Inducing”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2023 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.