• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

“What earlier generations held as sacred, remains sacred and great for us too…” Pope Benedict XVI (7 July 2007)

  • Our Team
  • Catholic Hymnal
  • Jogues Missal
  • Site Map
  • Donate
Views from the Choir Loft

Are the Readings at Mass Meant to Be Didactic or Doxological?

Fr. David Friel · July 17, 2016

OTA IX International Liturgy Conference was held last weekend in Cork City, Ireland. The annual Fota conference is a project of the St. Colman Society for Catholic Liturgy and is supported strongly by His Eminence Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke.

The three-day symposium offered a tremendous line-up of 13 speakers, each of whom delivered a scholarly paper on a topic related to this year’s theme, Verbum Domini: Liturgy and Scripture. One may find a list of speakers and their paper titles below. One may also expect the full proceedings to be published in a forthcoming volume.

The conference featured, moreover, Pontifical Vespers (led by Cardinal Burke) on Saturday evening and Pontifical High Masses on Sunday (Cardinal Burke) and Monday (Bishop Peter Elliot).

INCE the theme of the conference centered on Sacred Scripture in the liturgy, it should be no surprise that parts of the various talks overlapped and enriched each other. Several of the presentations dealt with the lectionary or some aspect of the intra-liturgical reading of Scripture. One of the issues that seemed to arise over and over again is the question of the purpose of the Scripture readings at Mass.

Generally, it is assumed that the readings serve one of two purposes (or both). First, the readings are sometimes seen as didactic, intended to offer instruction to those who hear them. The second approach to the readings understands them as doxological, meant simply to honor and praise the Lord. Is one of these understandings more appropriate than the other? Allow me to share with you insights from two of the conference speakers to help answer this question.

First, Rev. Stefan Heid gave a fascinating lecture on the opening day of the conference about the role and direction of the ambo in both the East and the West. Both the role and direction, interestingly, seem to have changed over time. Those familiar with the Missal of St. Pius V know that the Gospel is traditionally read while facing north, symbolically addressing the Good News to the Goths and pagans needing to be evangelized in north central Europe. What I learned from Professor Heid is that the earlier tradition in the West (as determined through archeological evidence) was actually to read the Gospel facing south.

The placement of ambos on high platforms outside the sanctuary, in the nave, serves both the practical purpose of aiding the acoustics of the space and the spiritual significance of the Word of the Lord descending upon the faithful from on high. One might presume from this placement that the readings would have been proclaimed in the direction of the people; “otherwise,” Fr. Heid explains, “one would not have bothered to construct an ambo in front of the sanctuary.” But this is not necessarily the case.

In such a case, though, the lector or deacon would have his back to the clerics. In addition, most ambos with two sets of stairs are constructed on the West-East axis. The parapets of the ambos and therefore the directions point to the north and the south. One may suppose that the ambos were used to proclaim readings across the nave.

Thus, the historical study of ambos shows that, when it came to the readings at Mass, the first consideration was not that they be read “to” the people. First and foremost, they were to be read toward God. That the readings might be heard by the people was an ancillary benefit.

Secondly, Msgr. Michael Magee (a former professor of mine at St. Charles Borromeo Seminary, Overbrook) spoke about the reform of the lectionary, evaluating the successes and limitations of the new three-year cycle and hypothesizing about prospects for the future of both lectionaries. Without a doubt, the three-year lectionary prizes highly the didactic potential of the readings at Mass. The wider selection (“richer fare,” SC 51) of Scripture passages included, coupled with the explicit preference for lectio continua, indicate a more didactic approach than in the old one-year cycle. Msgr. Magee’s sense is that the readings ought to serve both purposes, such that primacy is given to their doxological character without precluding the full exercise of their didactic power.

In my opinion, the reforms of the Second Vatican Council constitute a marked shift with respect to the understanding of the readings at Mass. Whereas the readings in the Mass codified at Trent (and still celebrated as the Extraordinary Form) seem to highlight the doxological aspect without obliterating their ability to instruct, the readings in the modern “Liturgy of the Word” appear to operate almost exclusively from their didactic nature. The primary evidence for this shift is the reformed practice of reading the Scriptures facing the people and almost always in the vernacular. This can be seen, also, from the heavy emphasis placed on homilies that draw their life from the readings, in place of the pre-conciliar tendency toward sermons that were frequently disconnected from the Epistle and Gospel passages of the day. None of this eliminates the possibility of the readings serving also a doxological purpose, but the reformed liturgy nevertheless requires special effort to be made in order to preserve and safeguard this important (and historical) nature of the readings.

Ideally, this should probably be a case of “both-and.” The readings, in both Ordinary & Extraordinary Forms, should be both doxological and didactic, but with primacy given to the doxological. Is this happening in our parishes?

Here is a list of the speakers and topics at Fota IX, in the order in which the papers were presented:

Bishop Peter Elliot – “The Heritage of Israel in the Roman Rite”

Fr. Joseph Briody – “Rediscovering the Septuagint: Text, Reception, Significance, Canon”

Dr. William Mahrt – “The Propers of the Mass”

Fr. Thomas McGovern – “The Eucharistic Liturgy and Scripture”

Fr. Paul Mankowski, SJ – “Latet Novum in Vetere: Old Testament Tributaries of Catholic Worship”

Professor Rev. Dr. Dr. Stefan Heid – “Function and Direction of the Ambo in the Byzantine and Roman Traditions”

Mr. Gregory DiPippo – “The Ambrosian Rite and the Reform of the Roman Lectionary”

Dr. Ann Orlando – “The Unity of Scripture and Liturgy in Augustine’s Homilies on John’s Gospel”

Fr. Kevin Zilverberg – “The Neo-Vulgate as Official Liturgical Translation”

His Eminence Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke – “The Process of Receiving Recognitio for Liturgical Texts”

Fr. Sven Leo Conrad, FSSP – “Observations on the Theology of the Liturgia Verbi with Reference to the Forma Extraordinaria”

Msgr. Michael Magee – “The Reform of the Lectionary: Evaluation and Prospects”

Fr. John M. Cunningham, OP – “The Oldest Christian Sermon”

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Fota Liturgy Conference, Liturgy of the Second Vatican Council, Novus Ordo Lectionary, Novus Ordo Lectionary Reform, Raymond Cardinal Leo Burke Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe to the CCW Mailing List

Fr. David Friel

About Fr. David Friel

Ordained in 2011, Father Friel served as Parochial Vicar at St. Anselm Parish in Northeast Philly. He is currently a doctoral candidate in liturgical theology at The Catholic University of America.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Quick Thoughts

6 January 2021 • Anglicans on Plainsong

A book published by Anglicans in 1965 has this to say about Abbat Pothier’s Editio Vaticana, the musical edition reproduced by books such as the LIBER USUALIS (Solesmes Abbey): “No performing edition of the music of the Eucharistic Psalmody can afford to ignore the evidence of the current official edition of the Latin Graduale, which is no mere reproduction of a local or partial tradition, but a CENTO resulting from an extended study and comparison of a host of manuscripts gathered from many places. Thus the musical text of the Graduale possesses a measure of authority which cannot lightly be disregarded.” They are absolutely correct.

—Jeff Ostrowski
2 January 2021 • Temptation

When I see idiotic statements made on the internet, I go nuts. When I see heretics promoted by people who should know better, I get angry. Learning to ignore such items is difficult—very difficult. I try to remember the words of Fr. Valentine Young: “Do what God places in front of you each day.” When I am honest, I don’t believe God wants me to dwell on errors and idiocy; there’s nothing I can do about that. During 2021, I will strive to do a better job following the advice of Fr. Valentine.

—Jeff Ostrowski
31 December 2020 • “COMITES CHRISTI”

The feasts for Saint Stephen Proto-Martyr (26 December), Saint John the Evangelist The Disciple Whom Jesus Loved (27 December), and the Feast of the Holy Innocents (28 December) seem untouched by any liturgical reforms. These are very powerful feasts—I believe they once possessed octaves—and I believe they could sometimes “overpower” a Sunday feast. The rules for octaves in the olden days are extremely complex. These feasts are sometimes referred to as a single entity as: Comites Christi (“Companions of Christ”). This is just a guess, but there seems to be a triple significance: STEPHEN martyred after Christ lived, JOHN was a martyr who knew Christ personally, and the HOLY INNOCENTS were martyred before Christ’s birth.

—Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

Many declare that Vatican Council II brought about a true springtime in the Church. Nevertheless, a growing number of Church leaders see this “springtime” as a rejection, a renunciation of her centuries-old heritage, or even as a radical questioning of her past and Tradition. Political Europe is rebuked for abandoning or denying its Christian roots; but the first to have abandoned her Christian roots and past is indisputably the post-conciliar Catholic Church.

— ‘Pope Francis’ Chief Liturgist (31 March 2017)’

Recent Posts

  • Thou Hast Saved the Good Wine until Now
  • “Homily for the 2nd Sunday after Epiphany” (EF) • Father Valentine Young, OFM
  • Lies, Lies, Lies
  • What Color Is B-Flat? Life as a Musician with Synesthesia
  • Catholic Choirmasters • Never Fall For This!

Copyright © 2021 Corpus Christi Watershed · Charles Garnier on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.