• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

The Illusion of Privacy • Social Media Etiquette for Liturgical Musicians

Richard J. Clark · July 15, 2016

THANK THE GOOD LORD that Facebook did not exist in my youth. I would have mishandled social media quite badly. I can only imagine the disaster a twenty-something me would have been with digital technology. I grew up with a phone that required my finger to rotate it. (I know. The horror.) I had a typewriter in college with plenty of Wite-Out™ on hand in case I made a mistake. The Lord blessed my youthful (and—ahem—not so youthful) indiscretions with inferior technology.

I also learned a valuable lesson some years ago. Deeply frustrated with a difficult professional situation, I sent an email to several colleagues venting this frustration. Understandable? Perhaps. No one is perfect and we all lose our cool from time to time. But a very wise, compassionate (and musically sympathetic) Jesuit priest kindly exhorted me to avoid writing such missives in a digital medium for the reasons I will discuss.

I quickly heeded his advice. So should you. Here’s why:

Theologican Goffredo Boselli states, “There is, then, an indissoluble link between the liturgy and the transmission of faith. We can say, in fact, that the celebration of the liturgy is the most important act of evangelization.”(pg. 209, The Spiritual Meaning of the Liturgy)

With so many challenging conditions and horrific events happening in the world, we must remember this. How we speak to each other about liturgy, and what we project to the public is more important than one may realize. Also consider this statement from the Synod of Bishops on New Evangelization (2012):

“The worthy celebration of the Sacred Liturgy is the primary and most powerful expression of the new evangelization. The liturgy is not just a human action but an encounter with God which leads to contemplation and deepening friendship with God. In this sense, the liturgy of the Church is the best school of the faith.”

Social media is a very powerful tool for good. How are we using it? If one is serious about a profession or a calling to serve to God, the following are some very important reminders to consider before publishing anything:


HUMAN NATURE AND THE ILLUSION OF PRIVACY

Intellectually, most of us are aware that most anything digital can be shared with anyone. Even if you limit privacy settings, screenshots or PDFs of most anything can exist even if a post or website is taken down. Even text messages aren’t completely private. (Ask Tom Brady.)

Some aren’t worried that their incredibly witty comments won’t go past their circle of “friends.” If technology doesn’t prohibit wide distribution of poorly conceived and uncharitable comments, human nature will.

As old as the hills is the power of gossip and the spreading of rumors. Facebook was unnecessary for neighbors to know your every move one hundred years ago, so why should that be different today? Even oceans can’t stop gossip, especially in tight-knit communities.

(I think of my grandfather who came to New York City from Italy in the 1920s. He intended to marry my grandmother who was still in Tuscany. Friends in New York tried to introduce him to other women. While my grandfather was not interested, he would tell his friends, “Gilda will find out!” No one argued, because they knew it was true.)

Rumors spread faster and more effectively than a Twitter account with a thousand followers. Human nature always was and always will be the strongest factor.


DON’T PUBLICLY DISPARAGE YOUR BOSS, A COLLEAGUE, A BRIDE, A COMPOSER, AN ENTIRE GENRE, ETC.

Submitting to the axiom that anything one publishes can potentially make all the rounds, this should be obvious. Not simply because your boss or someone with power might read it. It goes to one’s professional and personal reputation.

I once witnessed a highly connected (and respected) individual look aghast from reading a post. It was from a prominent musician complaining about one’s superior.

Don’t do that.

Many others saw it, talked about it, and spread the message with a thing called “word of mouth.” Social media was rendered irrelevant. Human nature amplified and “gave legs” to the story far more effectively.

Conversely, I read two memorable threads (from two very different liturgical worlds) involving prominent figures. In both cases, one attacked the other. In both cases, the one being attacked remained charitable and civil throughout. (DO THIS. Better yet, don’t even respond.) In each case, the public debate reflected quite well on one and rather poorly on the other. (No, I will not disclose identities even privately.)

Finally, disparagement of a composer or entire genre is exceedingly unhelpful. It does more to damage the cause than to further it. It exhibits provincial and parochial behavior. Civil commentary backed up up with intelligent analysis is different. Incivility is unchristian.


DON’T PUBLICLY POST A PRIVATE COMMUNICATION.

Just don’t.

While many of your friends may agree and you may enjoy wonderful banter, be sure that many others who are not interacting with the post are reading it and not thinking well of what they see.


”ABC” • “SUNSHINE & LIGHT”
I advise young people, especially, to be nothing but “sunshine and light” on social media. Here are some do’s and don’ts:

• Be encouraging. Be a mentor if given the opportunity. You might change someone’s life.
• Avoid the herd mentality: Think independently and comment selectively.
• Make sure any debate or criticism is intelligently stated and fair.
• Be ready to back up your statements—not only on social media, but to actual real people if personally confronted.
• Never “like” or comment anything disparaging or unfairly negative—no matter how tempting. Seriously. Don’t.
• ABC 2X: Always be civil. Always be charitable.

Do the above, and the conversation on liturgy, prayer, and God may open a door to evangelization even if only a little.

M I SUCKING ALL THE FUN out of social media? Most definitely! But if you are serious about your profession and serious about serving God, be prepared to keep the discussion on liturgy, our greatest form of evangelization, informed and enlightened.

To varying degrees, we are all public figures, even if only in our own parishes—the most important place! Are we furthering the edification of the faithful in our words?

Fair debate is a wonderful thing. But be mindful to remain in service of God. I need to remind myself of this every day! Do I ever.

AMDG

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Richard J. Clark

Richard J. Clark is the Director of Music of the Archdiocese of Boston and the Cathedral of the Holy Cross.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 21 September 2025) discusses some theological items—supported by certain verses in ancient Catholic hymns—and ends by explaining why certain folks become delirious with jealousy when they observe feats by Monsignor Ronald Knox.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
    It’s always amusing to see old diocesan newspapers—in huge capital letters—advertising the Cheapest Catholic Paper in the United States. The correspondent who sent this to me added: “I can think of certain composers, published by large companies in our own day, who could truthfully brag about the most tawdry compositions in the world!” I wonder what she could have meant by such a cryptic comment…
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies
    Along with so many others, I have deep respect for Dom Gregory Gregory Murray, who produced this clever harmonization (PDF) of “O SANCTISSIMA.” It’s always amazed me that Dom Gregory—a truly inspired composer—was so confused when it came to GREGORIAN CHANT. Throughout his life, he published contradictory statements, veering back-and-forth like a weather vane. Toward the end of his life, he declared: “I see clearly that the need for reform in liturgical music arose, not in the 18th and 19th centuries, but a thousand years earlier—in the 8th and 9th centuries, or even before that. The abuses began, not with Mozart and Haydn, but with those over-enthusiastic medieval musicians who developed the elaborate and flamboyant Gregorian Chant.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Karl Keating • “Canonization Questions”
    We were sent an internet statement (screenshot) that’s garnered significant attention, in which KARL KEATING (founder of Catholic Answers) speaks about whether canonizations are infallible. Mr. Keating seems unaware that canonizations are—in the final analysis—a theological opinion. They are not infallible, as explained in this 2014 article by a priest (with a doctorate in theology) who worked for multiple popes. Mr. Keating says: “I’m unaware of such claims arising from any quarter until several recent popes disliked by these Traditionalists were canonized, including John XXIII, Paul VI, and John Paul II. Usually Paul VI receives the most opprobrium.” Mr. Keating is incorrect; e.g. Father John Vianney, several centuries ago, taught clearly that canonizations are not infallible. Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen would be another example, although clearly much more recent than Saint John Vianney.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Vatican II Changed Wedding Propers?
    It’s often claimed that the wedding propers were changed after Vatican II. As a matter of fact, that is a false claim. The EDITIO VATICANA propers (Introit: Deus Israel) remained the same after Vatican II. However, a new set of propers (Introit: Ecce Deus) was provided for optional use. The same holds true for the feast of Pope Saint Gregory the Great on 3 September: the 1943 propers (Introit: Si díligis me) were provided for optional use, but the traditional PROPRIA MISSAE (Introit: Sacerdótes Dei) were retained; they weren’t gotten rid of. The Ordo Cantus Missae (1970) makes this crystal clear, as does the Missal itself. There was an effort made in the post-conciliar years to eliminate so-called “Neo-Gregorian” chants, but (contrary to popular belief) most were retained: cf. the feast of Christ the King, the feast of the Immaculate Conception, and so forth.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Solemn “Salve Regina” (Chant)
    How many “S” words can you think of using alliteration? How about Schwann Solemn Salve Score? You can download the SOLEMN SALVE REGINA in Gregorian Chant. The notation follows the official rhythm (EDITIO VATICANA). Canon Jules Van Nuffel, choirmaster of the Cathedral of Saint Rumbold, composed this accompaniment for it (although some feel it isn’t his best work).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“Now we are aware of the fact that during recent years some artists, gravely offending against Christian piety, have dared to bring into churches works devoid of any religious inspiration and completely at variance with the right rules of art.”

— Ven. Pope Pius XII (25 December 1955)

Recent Posts

  • New Bulletin Article • “21 September 2025”
  • How do you pronounce this word in Latin?
  • Cheap! Cheap! Cheap!
  • Children’s Repertoire: “3 Recommendations”
  • PDF Download • Dom Murray Harmonies

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.