• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
    • “Let the Choir Have a Voice” (Essay)
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Introductory Rites: Madness or Preparation?

Richard J. Clark · July 11, 2014

OR A REASON I CANNOT EXPLAIN, the Introductory Rites are the most misunderstood and mangled part of the mass, even by good priests who tend not to exhibit liturgical problems elsewhere. More specifically, the Penitential Act and Kyrie are routinely a problem area. It falls into one of two extremes: 1• It is rarely a problem. 2• It is routinely botched nearly every Sunday. But it doesn’t end there.

I don’t have the answer why many good, conscientious priests do not understand the structure of the three forms of the Penitential Act and its relationship with the Kyrie. (Many musicians do not either!) My observations are drawn from a wide variety of circumstances, professional and personal.

For example, here is a recent conversation with a priest whom, by the way, I greatly admire:
    Priest: Are you doing a Kyrie?
    Me (Voice inside my head): DOING a Kyrie? What?
    Me (Outside voice): We will sing the Kyrie as part of Penitential Act C.
    Priest: What’s that?
    Me: We will sing the invocations within the Kyrie. We will then sing the Gloria after the Absolution.
    Priest: Great!

As such, two of the most common problems I encounter (and there are many others) are 1• those who believe singing the Kyrie replaces the Penitential Act, i.e., sing the Penitential Act, Form C without the invocations 2• Omitting the Kyrie after the Penitential Act when using Form A (Confiteor) or Form B.

As such, these two articles on the Kyrie will clarify much:
      * *  Lord, Have Mercy? Andrew Motyka
      * *  Is the Kyrie Part of the Penitential Rite? Jeff Ostrowski

UT WITH CONFUSION COMES OPPORTUNITY. The Introductory rites, and their potential variations, (e.g., Sprinkling during the Easter Season) offer an opportunity for Music Directors and priests to get together and discuss the Introductory rites, at least for logistical reasons. This is a necessity anyway. It also offers an opportunity to find what the pastor’s preferences are for the Penitential Act. If you are lucky, this may open the door to constructive dialogue regarding more elements of the Introductory Rites and the liturgy in general.

What is the Purpose of the Introductory Rites?

I recently attended a mass with my family (in and of itself a rare occurrence) and experienced yet another common set of problems. After the Entrance Hymn the priest had a few words to say about the readings of the day. While this practice is not my preference, it is very common and can be done well if pointed and brief. The GIRM only allows this if there is no music, but it is common practice nonetheless.

GIRM #48. If there is no singing at the Entrance, the antiphon given in the Missal is recited either by the faithful, or by some of them, or by a reader; otherwise, it is recited by the Priest himself, who may even adapt it as an introductory explanation (cf. no. 31).

Unfortunately, this introductory explanation morphed into a rambling ferverino which awkwardly segued into the Confiteor (Penitential Act, Form A), thus skipping the Sign of the Cross, and the Greeting. After the absolution, the Kyrie was skipped. The Gloria was then recited.

I will not draw a personal judgment from this. Although it was indeed very sloppy, these kinds of improvised accretions and omissions, while well intended, are sadly all too common. (The rest of the mass had no such problems and the priest was very kind to my children afterward. I thanked this kind priest for his prayers.)

My objection to all of this was not the lack of compliance with the GIRM. My objection to such loose practices is based in missing the very purpose of these rites which is to prepare ourselves for what comes after. The GIRM succinctly states:

A. The Introductory Rites 46. The rites that precede the Liturgy of the Word, namely, the Entrance, the Greeting, the Penitential Act, the Kyrie, the Gloria in excelsis (Glory to God in the highest) and Collect, have the character of a beginning, an introduction, and a preparation. Their purpose is to ensure that the faithful, who come together as one, establish communion and dispose themselves properly to listen to the Word of God and to celebrate the Eucharist worthily.

“Worthily” is a key word (something I will always struggle to achieve). Furthermore, the people to do not deserve an unprepared and altered preparation. A pastoral approach is to enter into preparation that quiets the heart (i.e., the Sacred Silence in the Penitential Act and after the invitation to pray, GIRM #45) Likewise, as musicians, we are very much part of this preparation. We are not commissioned simply to execute the musical portions, but to do so with the spirit of their context: to prepare people to hear the Word and enter into the Sacred Mysteries, worthily and not haphazardly or half-heartedly with our music.

The GRM for the Entrance states its purpose well:

GIRM #47. When the people are gathered, and as the Priest enters with the Deacon and ministers, the Entrance Chant begins. Its purpose is to open the celebration, foster the unity of those who have been gathered, introduce their thoughts to the mystery of the liturgical time or festivity, and accompany the procession of the Priest and ministers.

HE INTRODUCTORY RITES ARE WONDERFULLY STRUCTURED to foster spiritual and mindful preparation. This is not something we simply DO and check off on our list. When we prepare in mind and spirit, the details that seem ancillary at first may take on a greater light. The simplicity, shape and rhythm of the Introductory Rites do the faithful a great service in opening their hearts and minds to receive our Lord in Word and in the Eucharist. Let us allow ourselves to be shaped by them and the greatness that follows.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Introductory Rites, Penitential Act Lord Have Mercy Kyrie Eleison Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Richard J. Clark

Richard J. Clark is the Director of Music of the Archdiocese of Boston and the Cathedral of the Holy Cross.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    Music List • (2nd Sunday of Lent)
    Readers have expressed interest in seeing the ORDER OF MUSIC I created for this coming Sunday, which is the 2nd Sunday of Lent (1 March 2026). If such a thing interests you, feel free to download it as a PDF file. This feast has magnificent propers. Its somber INTROIT is particularly striking—using a haunting tonality—but the COMMUNION with its fauxbourdon verses is also quite remarkable. I encourage all the readers to visit the feasts website, where the Propria Missae may be downloaded completely free of charge.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Like! Like! Like!
    You won’t believe who recently gave us a “like” on the Corpus Christi Watershed FACEBOOK PAGE. Click here (PDF) to see who it was. We were not only sincerely honored, we were utterly flabbergasted. This was truly a resounding endorsement and unmistakable stamp of approval.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Which Mass?
    In 1905, when the Vatican Commission on Gregorian Chant began publishing the EDITIO VATICANA—still the Church’s official edition— they assigned different Masses to different types of feasts. However, they were careful to add a note (which began with the words “Qualislibet cantus hujus Ordinarii…”) making clear “chants from one Mass may be used together with those from others.” Sadly, I sometimes worked for TLM priests who weren’t fluent in Latin. As a result, they stubbornly insisted Mass settings were ‘assigned’ to different feasts and seasons (which is false). To understand the great variety, one should examine the 1904 KYRIALE of Dr. Peter Wagner. One should also look through Dom Mocquereau’s Liber Usualis (1904), in which the Masses are all mixed up. For instance, Gloria II in his book ended up being moved to the ‘ad libitum’ appendix in the EDITIO VATICANA.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Extreme Unction
    Those who search Google for “CCCC MS 079” will discover high resolution images of a medieval Pontificale (“Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, MS 079”). One of the pages contains this absolutely gorgeous depiction of the Sacrament of Extreme Unction.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    PDF Chart • “Plainsong Rhythm”
    I will go to my grave without understanding the lack of curiosity so many people have about the rhythmic modifications made by Dom André Mocquereau. For example, how can someone examine this single sheet comparison chart and at a minimum not be curious about the differences? Dom Mocquereau basically creates a LONG-SHORT LONG-SHORT rhythmic pattern—in spite of enormous and overwhelming manuscript evidence to the contrary. That’s why some scholars referred to his method as “Neo-Mensuralist” or “Neo-Mensuralism.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF • “O Come All Ye Faithful” (Simplified)
    I admire the harmonization of “Adeste Fideles” by David Willcocks (d. 2015), who served as director of the Royal College of Music (London, England). In 2025, I was challenged to create a simplified arrangement for organists incapable of playing the authentic version at tempo. The result was this simplified keyboard arrangement (PDF download) based on the David Willcocks version of “O Come All Ye Faithful.” Feel free to play through it and let me know what you think.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“The chapter decides that henceforth neither singers nor instrumentalists may be loaned to any outside individual or organization, any more than can the chalices or copes owned by the cathedral. This prohibition applies to all those days of the church calendar for which polyphony is designated.” [From “The Life of Father Francisco Guerrero.”]

— Sevilla: Chapter Resolution (13 June 1561)

Recent Posts

  • Music List • (2nd Sunday of Lent)
  • PDF Download • “Funerals in the Ordinary Form”
  • Extreme Unction
  • Like! Like! Like!
  • Which Mass?

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2026 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.