• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
    • “Let the Choir Have a Voice” (Essay)
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Communion in the Hand

Dr. Peter Kwasniewski · March 14, 2013

ERMISSION to receive communion in the hand is something the devil worked hard to achieve by influencing ecclesiastical authorities to relax a discipline that was longstanding, unchallenged, and wise. Satan derives a demented pleasure from seeing the Holy Eucharist profaned and desecrated. This happens in two ways: through negligence, as when people carelessly drop fragments of the host or spill the precious Blood; through contempt, as when non-Catholic visitors and tourists receive the Blessed Sacrament, or when anti-Catholics deliberately carry them away in order to destroy them, use them in Satanic worship, or sell them online.

Reports of sacrilege are on the increase. A few years ago we saw the sickening spectacle of a religion-hating professor who posted numerous videos of himself violently disposing of hosts he had carried away from Masses. In one video he drove a nail through the host before throwing it away; in another, he flushed a host down the toilet. It seems hard to believe that he bought hosts from a supplier and merely pretended to do all this. It is far more likely that he was collecting hosts at Masses, because there is rarely any vigilance when it comes to who receives, who doesn’t, and, in general, how the Blessed Sacrament is treated and cared for. All this has been made possible by that most foolish, most nearsighted of all decisions: to allow communion in the hand.

When we ponder the awesome mystery that in the Holy Eucharist is really, truly, substantially present Our Lord Jesus Christ, in his Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity, the above-mentioned facts should cause us immense anguish, sadness, and righteous anger. To treat a host hatefully is, from a certain aspect, the worst possible sin a person can commit, and the most offensive to a believing Catholic.

Our Lord himself, glorified in heaven, is beyond all suffering; He is not directly harmed when the Blessed Sacrament is harmed. He is present in the sacrament as the Risen Christ seated at the right hand of the Father; after the resurrection He cannot suffer or die, but lives in the glory of immortality, bestowing that immortality on all souls that are incorporated into His Mystical Body and die in union with Him. The person who is harmed by desecration is the desecrator—and this shows us why Satan delights in desecration. Anyone who performs this act is committing the sin of Judas, the crime of betraying that which deserves our fidelity, the crime of hating that which most deserves our love, the crime of holding in contempt that mystery which deserves our heartfelt adoration on bended knee. It is a mockery of Christ; it is nothing less than a rejection of His adorable Person, and therefore a rejection of the Father who sent Him. As unfashionable as it is to say nowadays, it is Jesus Christ who, out of love for truth and righteousness, will send to hell all the souls who have rejected Him and consign their future bodies to the same eternal punishment.

No wonder the devil is eager to see hosts treated carelessly, disrespectfully, or blasphemously. These are steps along the same continuum, steps towards that ultimate separation from the infinitely holy God whom we must worship in spirit and in truth.

Apart from stories of Black Masses, there is the basic question of reverence. The priest’s hands are specially consecrated with holy oil, and why? So that he may rightly and fittingly handle the Blessed Sacrament. His hands are holy in view of touching and administering the holy gifts of the altar. A layman’s hands are not consecrated in this way. We receive the Holy Eucharist from the hands of a priest who is ordained to act in persona Christi, as a representative of the Lord Himself; we open our mouths to receive the nourishment of our body and soul, like a baby bird fed in the nest by its parent. From this symbolic vantage, it is wholly inappropriate that the priest put the host into our hands, so that we may then administer communion to ourselves. This gesture means: “I’m grown up and can feed myself, thank you very much, and my hands are just as good as the priest’s.” But this is simply false; we cannot feed ourselves, only Christ the High Priest can do so, and His ordained minister acts in His place, specially set apart by holy orders, with hands, too, set apart for the work of the altar. Communion in the hand helps create and support that fatal atmosphere of egalitarianism, horizontalism, and activism that has poisoned the spiritual life of the Church in the past forty years.

We must therefore do all in our power—with patience, yes, but also with a perseverance that never quits—to overturn the practice of communion in the hand and to replace it with a worthier manner of reception, namely, on the tongue of the kneeling communicant. Such a manner of receiving cannot, in and of itself, prevent unworthy communions from happening, but the evils will be limited, and the goods of devotion, piety, and reverence greatly increased and multiplied. As we know, it became the only way Pope Benedict distributed communion at his Masses. According to the universal law of the Church, it is a way in which each one of us, right now, can receive our Lord Jesus Christ, wherever we are, whenever we attend His Holy Sacrifice.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Dr. Peter Kwasniewski

A graduate of Thomas Aquinas College (B.A. in Liberal Arts) and The Catholic University of America (M.A. and Ph.D. in Philosophy), Dr. Peter Kwasniewski is currently Professor at Wyoming Catholic College. He is also a published and performed composer, especially of sacred music.

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    PDF Download • “Sprinkling Rite”
    Liturgical reformers who gained power after Vatican II frequently caused great suffering to musicians. With the stroke of a pen, they sometimes make changes that would require thousands—or even millions—of man hours (work undertaken by composers and editors). The Sprinkling Rite during Eastertide is but one tiny example. The version given in that PDF document was the original melody for Roman Missal, Third Edition. Some still prefer that version. However, at the last moment, an “unknown hand” tinkered with a few notes in the antiphon. Those who examine the current edition can verify this with their own eyes.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    ‘Sarum’ Good Friday?
    Plainsong of the Roman Rite has many variants—i.e. slight ‘variations’ or ‘alterations’ made to the ancient melodies. Variants often thrive in particular religious orders. Likewise, before Henry VIII broke away from the Catholic Church, Gregorian Chant variants were frequently associated with individual cathedrals in England: Hereford, Lincoln, Salisbury, and so forth. In the early 20th century, the (Anglican) organist at Westminster Abbey married “Let All Mortal Flesh Keep Silence” to this beautiful variant melody from England. Those who sing Gregorian Chant on Good Friday will recognize the melody. What do you think of this pairing?
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • “Eb Organ Postlude”
    Gustav Adolf Merkel (d. 1885) was a German organist, teacher, and composer. Although a Lutheran himself, he held the appointment at the (Roman Catholic) Cathedral of Dresden from 1864 until his death. You can download his Organ Postlude in E-Flat, which I like very much. He has an interesting way of marking the pedal notes. What do you think?
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Gregorian Chant Quiz” • 24 March 2026
    How well do you know your Gregorian hymns? Do you recognize the tune inserted into the bass line on this score? For many years, we sang the entire Mass in Gregorian chant—and I mean everything. As a result, it would be difficult to find a Gregorian hymn I don’t recognize instantly. Only decades later did I realize (with sadness) that this skill cannot be ‘monetized’… This particular melody is used for a very famous Gregorian hymn, printed in the LIBER USUALIS. Do you recognize it? Send me an email with the correct words, and I promise to tell everybody I meet about your prowess!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • “Ubi Caritas” (SATB)
    I remember singing “Ubi Cáritas” by Maurice Duruflé at the conservatory. I was deeply moved by it. However, some feel Duruflé’s version isn’t suitable for small choirs since it’s written for 6 voices and the bass tessitura is quite low. That’s why I was absolutely thrilled to discover this “Ubi cáritas” (SATB) for smaller choirs by Énemond Moreau, who studied with OSCAR DEPUYDT (d. 1925), an orphan who became a towering figure of Catholic music. Depuydt’s students include: Flor Peeters (d. 1986); Monsignor Jules Van Nuffel (d. 1953); Arthur Meulemans (d. 1966); Monsignor Jules Vyverman (d. 1989); and Gustaaf Nees (d. 1965). Rehearsal videos for each individual voice await you at #19705. When I came across the astonishing English translation for “Ubi Cáritas” by Monsignor Ronald Knox—matching the Latin’s meter—I decided to add those lyrics as an option (for churches which have banned Latin). My wife and I made this recording to give you some idea how it sounds.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    PDF Download • “Holy, Holy, Holy”
    For vigil Masses on Saturday (a.k.a. “anticipated” Masses) we use this simpler setting of the “Holy, Holy, Holy” by Monsignor Jules Vyverman (d. 1989), a Belgian priest, organist, composer, and music educator who ultimately succeeded another ‘Jules’ (CANON JULES VAN NUFFEL) as director of the Lemmensinstituut in Belgium. Although I could be wrong, my understanding is that the LEMMENSINSTITUUT eventually merged with “Catholic University of Leuven” (originally founded in 1425). That’s the university Fulton J. Sheen attended.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“Young people have entrusted me with their absolute preference for the Extraordinary Form… […] But, above all, how can we understand—how can we not be surprised and deeply shocked—that what was the rule yesterday is prohibited today? Is it not true that prohibiting or suspecting the Extraordinary Form can only be inspired by the demon who desires our suffocation and spiritual death?”

— Cardinal Sarah to Edward Pentin (23 September 2019)

Recent Posts

  • PDF Download • “Sprinkling Rite”
  • ‘Sarum’ Good Friday?
  • Gregorian Chant • The “Correct” Way of Singing ?
  • PDF Download • “Eb Organ Postlude”
  • Fulton J. Sheen • “24-Hour Catechism”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2026 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.