About this blogger:
Ordained in 2011, Father Friel served for five years as Parochial Vicar at St. Anselm Parish in Northeast Philly. He is currently studying toward an STL in sacred liturgy at The Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C.
Connect on Facebook:
Connect on Twitter:
“Church officials frequently asked Tomás Luis de Victoria for his opinion on cathedral appointments because of his fame and knowledge. He was faithful to his position as convent organist even after his professional debut as an organist, and never accepted any extra pay for being a chapelmaster. Held in great esteem, his contract allowed him frequent travel away from the convent, and he attended Palestrina's funeral (in Rome) in 1594.”
— Dr. Robert Stevenson, 1961 (mod.)

Whose Responsibility Is It To Establish New EF Communities?
published 10 January 2016 by Fr. David Friel

N 2007, the third year of his reign, then-Pope Benedict XVI published the landmark motu proprio, Summorum Pontificum. Since that time, the proliferation of Extraordinary Form Masses has been remarkable, as JMO recently argued. This is a very good thing.

In the discussion following upon that recent post, a few readers suggested that it is incumbent upon priests to lead their people towards the Extraordinary Form. This initiative, in their view, should come from priests as “shepherds” (pastores).

This is not, however, the vision given by our Pope Emeritus in the document itself:

Art. 5, §1 In parishes where a group of the faithful attached to the previous liturgical tradition stably exists, the parish priest should willingly accede to their requests to celebrate Holy Mass according to the rite of the 1962 Roman Missal. He should ensure that the good of these members of the faithful is harmonized with the ordinary pastoral care of the parish, under the governance of the bishop in accordance with Canon 392, avoiding discord and favouring the unity of the whole Church.

This excerpt makes clear that, in forming EF communities, the initiative comes first from the faithful. The parish priest, subsequently, is obliged to “accede” willingly to their requests.

This is not to say, of course, that it would be wrong for a priest to share with his people the riches he has discovered in the Extraordinary Form. Nor would it be inappropriate for him to encourage his people to seek out opportunities to participate in EF Masses. Nor is there any reason a priest could not begin offering EF Masses at his parish before he has received a request for it from the people.

It is not fair, however, to claim that priests must actively establish new EF communities or that this is in some fashion part of their pastoral responsibility.

In his letter to bishops accompanying Summorum Pontificum, Pope Benedict writes:

The use of the old Missal presupposes a certain degree of liturgical formation and some knowledge of the Latin language; neither of these is found very often. Already from these concrete presuppositions, it is clearly seen that the new Missal will certainly remain the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite, not only on account of the juridical norms, but also because of the actual situation of the communities of the faithful.

We must respect the vision of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI, who so brilliantly crafted the language of Ordinary Form and Extraordinary Form and who so generously made provision for all priests and all the faithful to celebrate the liturgy according to the ancient usage.