About this blogger:
A theorist, organist, and conductor, Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004), and did graduate work in Musicology. He serves as choirmaster for the new FSSP parish in Los Angeles, where he resides with his wife and children.
Connect on Facebook:
Connect on Twitter:
“I still haven’t made up my mind whether I shall publish it all. Some people are so humorless, so uncharitable, and so absurdly wrong-headed, that one would probably do far better to relax and enjoy life than worry oneself to death trying to instruct or entertain a public which will only despise one’s efforts, or at least feel no gratitude for them. Most readers know nothing about canon law. Many regard it with contempt and find everything heavy going that isn’t completely lowbrow. Some are so grimly serious that they disapprove of all humor. Others come to different conclusions every time they stand up or sit down. They seize upon your publications, as a wrestler seizes upon his opponent’s hair, and use them to drag you down, while they themselves remain quite invulnerable, because their barren pates are completely bald, so there’s nothing for you to get hold of.”
— St. Thomas More to Peter Gilles, 1516

What Happened To Chapel Veils At Mass?
published 19 June 2013 by Jeff Ostrowski

ATT FRADD has posted an interesting article called “What Happened to Headcoverings at Mass?” He speaks about Canon Law as it relates to women and girls covering their heads during Mass. In general, I have no issue with Chapel veils. As a matter of fact, I really like them, but I think it’s better when the entire congregation wears them, rather than only some. Women at the FSSP parishes usually wear veils, but only in America. This is not done in Europe, according to what I’ve been told and witnessed.

Years ago, at a “traditional” parish that shall remain nameless, I saw a parishioner rudely confronting a women not wearing a Chapel veil. Being rather young and brash, I inserted myself into the conversation. The man was showing this poor woman a document from the early 1900s insisting women cover their heads. I asked the gentleman, “What does it say right above?” Then he read the preceding sentence, which mandated that women and men sit on opposite (separated) sides of the church building. As you can see, I had done my homework in advance. “Do we do that here?” I asked. The conversation ended.

The reality is, the same document he quoted said in no uncertain terms that men and women must sit on opposite halves of the church. If you’re having difficulty picturing all the boys from a family sitting in a different pew from all the girls, you’re not alone. This practice was hardly ever done in America, from what I’m told.

Are you old enough to remember the old Latin Mass? Did they make girls sit on one side and boys sit on the other? We did this for school Masses, but adults were still free to sit on either side.