• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Is It Time To Stop Singing The Propers?

Dr. Alfred Calabrese · January 19, 2020

Now that I have your attention, allow me to make my real point, which is: Does the way we sing the Propers matter?

Since I am not involved with a Latin Mass parish I cannot speak to how chant is received by the faithful. I  assume, however, that those who attend know that chant will be sung and they accept it no matter what it sounds like. Conversely, I know how difficult it can be to introduce chant (and for that matter, Latin) into a Novus Ordo parish. After many years of slowly adding the Propers to the Mass I can say this with confidence: people will accept it much more easily if it sounds beautiful.

Anyone who knows me knows that my one constant philosophy of choral singing is that, first and foremost, the choir must sound as beautiful as possible. If we’re not going to try to sing beautifully, then why sing at all? This is especially true of music for the sacrifice of the Mass. Here are some ways to make the Propers sound beautiful and meaningful.

1. Start with the text
Gregorian chant is rhetorical. Text painting abounds. Read the text carefully with attention to its meaning and find these special moments. Teach your choir why the melody rises here or falls there, why this mode is better for these words than another, why certain syllables are lengthened or why some notes are repeated. Show them by singing it yourself. Make endings slow and soften ever so slightly so that sentences come to natural endings. I like to tell my choirs that when they sing the chants they are telling the listeners a story. Everyone singing the chant must fall in love with the words first, and this starts with the choir director whose own passion for the text is given to the singers.

2. Unify vowels.
This is true for any kind of choral singing. Unifying vowels helps with tuning, blend, and creates a sound that most everyone agrees is beautiful and arresting, as opposed to one in which we hear various individual voices. Depending on what region of the country you are in, this may take up most of your rehearsal time.

3. Choose a tempo that moves.
How often have we heard from enemies of chant that it is a ‘dirge,’ that it ‘plods,’ or is boring or uninteresting? That is not the fault of the chant, it’s the fault of the person leading the chant. Chant should have momentum, forward motion, and direction. It should sound at times exciting, mysterious, subtle, relevant, intelligent, and intelligible. If the tempo is so slow that by the time one sings the end of the sentence no one can remember how the sentence started, well, that’s a problem. Think about how tempo affects what is being communicated in the text.

4. Consider your acoustic.
The acoustic affects tempo, or does it? While it’s true that a reverberant church requires the tempo to be a bit slower than in a dry acoustic, the difference really doesn’t need to be all that drastic. Instead, the acoustic really affects the amount of time between phrases. In a dry acoustic, take less time between phrases; in a reverberant acoustic, let the music breathe more between phrases before beginning again. This allows the big acoustic to enhance the sound while allowing the listeners ears to take it all in.

5. Don’t be afraid of English
You don’t have to look very far on the internet to find ‘experts’ that will tell you that you’re setting the revival of chant and sacred music back by sixty years if you do chant in English. I will tell you here and now that I do chant in just about every combination of languages you can imagine, from full Latin chants and verses, to Latin chant with English verses, Gregorian melodies set to English words, and the Simple English Propers by Adam Bartlett. I’ve even written my own melodies. If you’re in a Novus Ordo parish, there’s nothing wrong in my book with singing whatever chant you can manage as long as it’s sung beautifully. You might have time to learn only one Latin Gregorian chant a month. Fine. Do English the rest of the month, and do it beautifully. And don’t let anyone scare you about not singing everything in Latin. They’re probably not even musicians anyway.

So, should we stop singing the Propers? Of course not. But we should be sure we are singing them in the most beautiful and meaningful way possible.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Follow the Discussion on Facebook

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 21, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Dr. Alfred Calabrese

Dr. Alfred Calabrese is Director of Music and Liturgy at St. Rita Catholic Church in Dallas, TX. He and his wife have two children.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    Why A “Fugue” Here?
    I believe I know why this plainsong harmonizer created a tiny fugue as the INTRODUCTION to his accompaniment. Take a look (PDF) and tell me your thoughts about what he did on the feast of the Flight of Our Lord Jesus Christ into Egypt (17 February). And now I must go because “tempus fugit” as they say!
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”
    My pastor requested that I write short articles each week for our parish bulletin. Those responsible for preparing similar write-ups may find a bit of inspiration in these brief columns. The latest article (dated 12 October 2025) talks about an ‘irony’ or ‘paradox’ regarding the 1960s switch to a wider use (amplior locus) of vernacular in the liturgy.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Reminder” — Month of October (2025)
    Those who don’t sign up for our free EMAIL NEWSLETTER miss important notifications. Last week, for example, I sent a message about this job opening for a music director paying $65,000 per year plus benefits (plus weddings & funerals). Notice the job description says: “our vision for sacred music is to move from singing at Mass to truly singing the Mass wherein … especially the propers, ordinaries, and dialogues are given their proper place.” Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “American Catholic Hymnal” (1991)
    The American Catholic Hymnal, with IMPRIMATUR granted (25 April 1991) by the Archdiocese of Chicago, is like a compendium of every horrible idea from the 1980s. Imagine being forced to stand all through Communion (even afterwards) when those self-same ‘enlightened’ liturgists moved the SEQUENCE before the Alleluia to make sure congregations wouldn’t have to stand during it. (Even worse, everything about the SEQUENCE—including its name—means it should follow the Alleluia.) And imagine endlessly repeating “Alleluia” during Holy Communion at every single Mass. It was all part of an effort to convince people that Holy Communion was historically a procession (which it wasn’t).
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    “Canonic” • Ralph Vaughan Williams
    Fifty years ago, Dr. Theodore Marier made available this clever arrangement (PDF) of “Come down, O love divine” by P. R. Dietterich. The melody was composed in 1906 by Ralph Vaughan Williams (d. 1958) and named in honor of of his birthplace: DOWN AMPNEY. The arrangement isn’t a strict canon, but it does remind one of a canon since the pipe organ employs “points of imitation.” The melody and text are #709 in the Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Did they simplify these hymn harmonies?
    Choirs love to sing the famous & splendid tune called “INNSBRUCK.” Looking through a (Roman Catholic) German hymnal printed in 1952, I discovered what appears to be a simplified version of that hymn. In other words, their harmonization is much less complex than the version found in the Saint Jean de Brébeuf Hymnal (which is suitable for singing by SATB choir). Please download their 1952 harmonization (PDF) and let me know your thoughts. I really like the groovy Germanic INTRODUCTION they added.
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“The chapter orders that only grandees (and their immediate relatives), counts, marquises, and provincial governors may in future enter the choir enclosure during divine service: such a restriction being imposed so that quiet can be the better maintained during cathedral solemnities.” [From “The Life of Father Francisco Guerrero.”]

— Sevilla: Chapter Resolution (25 May 1558)

Recent Posts

  • The Real Miracle of Gregorian Chant
  • Why A “Fugue” Here?
  • “Three Reasons To Shun Bad Hymns” • Daniel B. Marshall
  • “Puzzling Comment” • By A Respected FSSP Priest
  • New Bulletin Article • “12 October 2025”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.