• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

Pope Saint Paul VI (3 April 1969): “Although the text of the Roman Gradual—at least that which concerns the singing—has not been changed, the Entrance antiphons and Communions antiphons have been revised for Masses without singing.”

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
    • Jeff’s Mom Joins Fundraiser
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
    • Feasts Website
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

The Lowest Musical Aspiration Possible – Or the Highest?

Richard J. Clark · January 9, 2015

HAVE TOLD THIS STORY several times before; it was a seminal moment as a young musician. Although I was a boy of eight or nine, I remember it like it was yesterday. It was 1977 or ’78. I was at mass in a gymnasium. We were not far from the basketball hoops that were pulled up to the ceiling. We sat in metal folding chairs. We knelt on tile of the basketball court. I don’t recall if this particular mass had a row of several guitarists on the stage to our left or if there was a cantor with the electronic organ. It didn’t matter. I had had enough.

I shook my head only slightly and said to myself, “To be a church musician has got to be the lowest musical aspiration possible.” The thought came to me only suddenly, but it was a long time coming. I was sad.

Meanwhile, I was blissfully unaware that the Novus Ordo was in its infancy. I was unaware that the 1973 translation of the 1970 Roman Missal was only a few years old. Also, our parish had a first class problem: It had grown so large that the simple, but beautiful church across the street was now much too small, necessitating overflow masses in the gym and likely overextending resources.

There was certainly a lot I didn’t understand as a child, (including how music, even at its highest levels can be devastatingly humbling). But I knew enough to understand that something was terribly wrong at mass. On the surface, I was aware of various levels of incompetence, probably by spirited volunteers with no training. My eight-year-old ears could tell. But while other musicians were in fact quite competent and highly trained, their input was stifled, perhaps by many factors. So, what else was the problem?

N TRUTH, IT WAS MUCH OF WHAT HAS PLAGUED many parishes in the last fifty years: highly varied interpretations or misinterpretations of Sacrosanctum Concilium, the rejection of certain traditions (which led to a “brain drain” of talented musicians who could no longer get work in the Catholic Church), and most fundamentally, a misunderstanding of the true purpose of sacred music: singing text and sacred melody wedded to the liturgical action of the mass. These problems clearly still plague the Church today.

In reality, my home parish, St. William the Abbot in Seaford, NY, was probably handling the traumatic changes in the Post-Conciliar era far better than most. Only recently do I appreciate some of it. And do I ever! Like a teenager who thinks he is smarter than his father, he eventually grows up, gets a job, and has children. As life gets more challenging, the wisdom of the father seems to grow with each passing year! (I’m now old enough that my father is a genius.) As such, I have viewed the leadership of longtime pastor of St. William’s, Msgr. Tomas G. Leavey, with growing admiration. While there were problems with music – typical of the day – it is what he did right that probably made me realize why the music was dreadfully inadequate. I will explain momentarily.

ERE’S WHAT ST. WILLIAM’S IN THE INFANCY of the Novus Ordo did right. Whether or not the several priests of this large parish agreed with the new translation and the reforms of Vatican II, they complied. More than that, it was evident that they said the mass with love.

In the 1970s at St. William’s, the mass was the mass. The mass was dignified and reverent – even in the gymnasium. This was not to be taken for granted. It went without saying that they took these words of Pope Paul VI to heart:

“Anyone who takes advantage of the reform to indulge in arbitrary experiments is wasting energy and offending the ecclesial sense.” [Paul VI, address of August 22, 1973: “L’Osservatore Romano,” August 23, 1973.]

We were spared the misguided experimentation, confusion, and liturgical abuse that was all too common in the period. Therefore, as a child, I could learn the rhythms of the liturgy and its shape. The value of this cannot be underestimated. My understanding was not conscious. But through the mass, the mystery of God had room to shine forth. Meanwhile, the humble priests of the parish were engaging, but never got in the way of allowing God’s work to speak for itself. As Goffredo Boselli so aptly states:

“…the liturgy is, in itself, mystagogy. It is by its very nature an epiphany of the mystery of God; in celebrating the mystery, we are initiated into the mystery…Through liturgy, the mystery is revealed, communicated, made known.” (The Spiritual Meaning of the Liturgy, pg. 4, Liturgical Press.)

All that St. William’s did right is what made me realize that the current state of music was not enough; it was not worthy of the mass that was reverent, prayerful, and dignified. This realization was a gift and a motivation for me for years to come.

THE HIGHEST MUSICAL ASPIRATION POSSIBLE

NE REASON I LIKE TO retell the story of my dismay as a child is the eventual irony of it all. I have since made a life in sacred music for more than a quarter century so far. I told this story to Dr. William Mahrt who responded with his beaming and beautiful smile, “It is the HIGHEST!” Dr. Mahrt is right.

Time moves on and seeds that are planted come to fruition. About eleven years ago, St. William’s pastor, Fr. William E. Koenig (now rector of St. Agnes Cathedral, Rockville Centre) looked to hire a new music director, Alfred Allongo. Hiring a full-time was a major step. Beyond that, Allongo was a perfect choice as he embodies what is best about the profession of sacred music. A true servant leader, he joins his musical skills with great charisma and a wise understanding of human nature. He established several new programs in the parish and the school. These continue to grow. Furthermore, the choirs are sounding better and better with each passing year. Not one to ever be satisfied, he looks for ways to improve while he deflects credit from himself by pointing out the hard work of his legion of volunteers who love to make music with him.

As to Allongo’s achievements, the proof is in the exponential improvement in congregational singing. Allongo’s choices and playing makes all the difference. The organ leads the congregation with a sprightly but very manageable tempo. Allongo’s playing never draws attention to himself, but is filled with little gems of lines and phrasing. His choice of cantors is exquisite, Matt Georgetti in particular sings with a straight tone voice that is pitch perfect, and proclaims the Word with humility.

This renaissance of sacred music at St. William the Abbot is a result of leadership that is one of service to God and the Church. This is the HIGHEST musical aspiration possible!

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Tagged With: Liturgy of the Second Vatican Council Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Richard J. Clark

Richard J. Clark is the Director of Music of the Archdiocese of Boston and the Cathedral of the Holy Cross.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    “Simplified” Keyboard Accompaniment (PDF)
    I’d much rather hear an organist play a simplified version correctly than listen to wrong notes. I invite you to download this simplified organ accompaniment for hymn #729 in the Father Brébeuf Hymnal. The hymn is “O Jesus Christ, Remember.” I’m toying with the idea of creating a whole bunch of these, to help amateur organists. The last one I uploaded was downloaded more than 1,900 times in a matter of hours—so there seems to be interest in such a project. For the record, this famous text by Oratorian priest, Father Edward Caswall (d. 1878) is often married to AURELIA, as it is in the Brébeuf Hymnal.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
    Father Adrian Porter, using the cracher dans la soupe example, did a praiseworthy job explaining the difference between ‘dynamic’ and ‘formal’ translation. This is something Monsignor Ronald Knox explained time and again—yet even now certain parties feign ignorance. I suppose there will always be people who pretend the only ‘valid’ translation of Mitigásti omnem iram tuam; avertísti ab ira indignatiónis tuæ… would be “You mitigated all ire of you; you have averted from your indignation’s ire.” Those who would defend such a translation suffer from an unfortunate malady. One of my professors called it “cognate on the brain.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
    Father Cuthbert Lattey (d. 1954) wrote: “In a large number of cases the ancient Christian versions and some other ancient sources seem to have been based upon a better Hebrew text than that adopted by the rabbis for official use and alone suffered to survive. Sometimes, too, the cognate languages suggest a suitable meaning for which there is little or no support in the comparatively small amount of ancient Hebrew that has survived. The evidence of the metre is also at times so clear as of itself to furnish a strong argument; often it is confirmed by some other considerations. […] The Jewish copyists and their directors, however, seem to have lost the tradition of the metre at an early date, and the meticulous care of the rabbis in preserving their own official and traditional text (the ‘massoretic’ text) came too late, when the mischief had already been done.” • Msgr. Knox adds: “It seems the safest principle to follow the Latin—after all, St. Jerome will sometimes have had a better text than the Massoretes—except on the rare occasions when there is no sense to be extracted from the Vulgate at all.”
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    “Reminder” — Month of November (2025)
    On a daily basis, I speak to people who don’t realize we publish a free newsletter (although they’ve followed our blog for years). We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and refuse to run annoying ads. As a result, our mailing list is crucial to our survival. Signing up couldn’t be easier: simply scroll to the bottom of any blog article and enter your email address.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Gospel Options for 2 November (“All Souls”)
    We’ve been told some bishops are suppressing the TLM because of “unity.” But is unity truly found in the MISSALE RECENS? For instance, on All Souls (2 November), any of these Gospel readings may be chosen, for any reason (or for no reason at all). The same is true of the Propria Missæ and other readings—there are countless options in the ORDINARY FORM. In other words, no matter which OF parish you attend on 2 November, you’ll almost certainly hear different propers and readings, to say nothing of different ‘styles’ of music. Where is the “unity” in all this? Indeed, the Second Vatican Council solemnly declared: “Even in the liturgy, the Church has no wish to impose a rigid uniformity in matters which do not implicate the faith or the good of the whole community.”
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Our Father” • Musical Setting?
    Looking through a Roman Catholic Hymnal published in 1859 by Father Guido Maria Dreves (d. 1909), I stumbled upon this very beautiful tune (PDF file). I feel it would be absolutely perfect to set the “Our Father” in German to music. Thoughts?
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Random Quote

“What will be the results of this innovation? The results expected, or rather desired, are that the faithful will participate in the liturgical mystery with more understanding, in a more practical, a more enjoyable and a more sanctifying way.” [Enjoyable?]

— Pope Paul VI (26 Nov 1969)

Recent Posts

  • “Simplified” Keyboard Accompaniment (PDF)
  • ‘Bogey’ of the Half-Educated: Paraphrase
  • Father Cuthbert Lattey • “The Hebrew MSS”
  • Re: The People’s Mass Book (1974)
  • They did a terrible thing

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.