• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

We’re a 501(c)3 public charity established in 2006. We have no endowment, no major donors, no savings, and run no advertisements. We exist solely by the generosity of small donors.

  • Donate
  • Our Team
    • Our Editorial Policy
    • Who We Are
    • How To Contact Us
    • Sainte Marie Bulletin Articles
  • Pew Resources
    • Brébeuf Catholic Hymnal
    • Jogues Illuminated Missal
    • KYRIALE • Saint Antoine Daniel
    • Campion Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Repository • “Spanish Music”
    • Ordinary Form Feasts (Sainte-Marie)
  • MUSICAL WEBSITES
    • René Goupil Gregorian Chant
    • Noël Chabanel Psalms
    • Nova Organi Harmonia (2,279 pages)
    • Roman Missal, 3rd Edition
    • Catechism of Gregorian Rhythm
    • Father Enemond Massé Manuscripts
    • Lalemant Polyphonic
  • Miscellaneous
    • Site Map
    • Secrets of the Conscientious Choirmaster
    • “Wedding March” for lazy organists
    • Emporium Kevin Allen
    • Saint Jean de Lalande Library
    • Sacred Music Symposium 2023
    • The Eight Gregorian Modes
    • Gradual by Pothier’s Protégé
    • Seven (7) Considerations
Views from the Choir Loft

Garbage in, Garbage out

Andrew R. Motyka · March 18, 2015

OMETIMES IT’S STRANGE to think about just how far computers have come in my lifetime (and I’m pretty young). I remember my family’s first computer when I was a kid, a 64kb PC. I also remember even then thinking how easy it was to mess something up. A tech-savvy friend once used the principal of GIGO – Garbage In, Garbage Out – to refer to how most computer errors are, in fact, user errors. A machine doesn’t do what you want it to do; it does what is designed to do.

I got thinking about that idea when speaking with a friend of mine a few days ago. He was telling me about a retreat that he had gone on. By his account, it was a great retreat: he came away spiritually edified, he had time for prayer and reflection, and he grew in discipleship. That sounds like a great retreat to me. His one complaint, though, was something about the music (hang on, let me practice my Surprised Face). The music was well executed, and the musicians certainly had played for Mass and devotions before. They played all the standard Catholic hits from the 80s, as well as some “Praise and Worship” music (side note: I find devotions to be a pretty good time for Praise and Worship music, actually).

What hit him a few days into the retreat, though, was what he described as, “I felt like we were singing nursery rhymes.” He is used to getting (in his words) “meat and potatoes” texts when singing at Mass, so when switching to these pieces, he felt like it was a bit dumbed down. I can relate to that.

I understand the desire for the familiar favorites that many Catholics mention when they consider their preferences of Catholic music. Most of the melodies and accompaniments are pleasant sounding, familiar, and beautiful in their own way, if simplistic. One issue with many of these preferences, though, is the lack of consideration of the text.

This tendency is one I recognize from high school. I know there are times when I expressed my dislike of a particular popular song, and was heralded as crazy. Most of the time it was because I didn’t like or relate to the words. I would usually get the response, “I like it because of the beat” or “I don’t really care about the words.” Before you know it, you’re singing along to that song, and repeating, over and over again, words that don’t represent who you are or what you believe (see John Lennon’s Imagine for a good example of this). Soon, you may even come to believe these things. You’ve said them out loud often enough.

You are shaped by the things you see and hear, but more importantly, you are shaped by the things you say and do. The Church certainly recognizes this in her simple encapsulation of liturgical theology: lex orandi, lex credendi (the law of prayer is the law of belief). We come to believe what we pray. We also come to believe what we do and what we sing. The principle lex orandi, lex credendi works both in favor of good theology and against it, and it extends beyond the liturgy into our lives. Garbage in, garbage out.

This brings me back to my friend’s retreat. He’s not normally one to complain about music or other shortcomings in the liturgy. He knows not everyone is where he is. However, he recognized something true about the music he was experiencing: it was shallow, or in his words, nursery rhymes. Such music was described to me by Leo Nestor as candy, which is fine in small amounts, but not in place of vegetables. He would also say, “Too much of that music will rot your teeth and erode your faith.” It’s been ten years since he said that in class (maybe I’m not as young as I thought), but I’ve never forgotten it.

The next time you choose a piece of music for the liturgy, ask yourself: what is this piece saying? Is there enough substance to this to spend our time putting it in our mouths? Is it even true? The text matters. In fact, it’s more important than the music because it precedes it. If a text isn’t worth reciting, it’s not worth singing. Regular readers of this website will know our preference for the propers. It’s no coincidence that the propers use Scripture as their basis for texts. It’s tough to say that a text is garbage when it comes from the Bible. That doesn’t mean that Scripture is the only text worth singing, but it’s a good benchmark.

Pay attention to your texts, and to quote Dr. Nestor again, always be careful what words you put into the mouths of the People of God.

Opinions by blog authors do not necessarily represent the views of Corpus Christi Watershed.

Filed Under: Articles Last Updated: January 1, 2020

Subscribe

It greatly helps us if you subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required

About Andrew R. Motyka

Andrew Motyka is the Archdiocesan Director of Liturgical Music and Cathedral Music for the Archdiocese of Indianapolis.—(Read full biography).

Primary Sidebar

Corpus Christi Watershed

President’s Corner

    Bugnini’s Statement (6 November 1966)
    With each passing day, more is revealed about how the enemies of the liturgy accomplished their goals. For instance, Hannibal Bugnini deeply resented the way Vatican II said Gregorian Chant “must be given first place in liturgical services.” On 6 November 1966, his cadre wrote a letter attempting to justify the elimination of Gregorian Chant with this brazen statement: “What really gives a Mass its tone is not so much the songs as it is the prayers and readings.” Bugnini’s cadre then attacked the very heart of Gregorian Chant (viz. the Proprium Missae), bemoaning how the Proprium Missae “is completely new each Sunday and feast day.” There is much more to be said about this topic. Stay tuned.
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Luis Martínez Must Go!
    Sevilla Cathedral (entry dated 13 December 1564): The chapter orders Luis Martínez, a cathedral chaplain, to stay away from the choirbook-stand when the rest of the singers gather around it to sing polyphony—the reason being that “he throws the others out of tune.” [Excerpt from “The Life of Father Francisco Guerrero.”]
    —Jeff Ostrowski
    Urgent! • We Desperately Need Funds!
    A few days ago, the president of Corpus Christi Watershed posted this urgent appeal for funds. Please help us make sure we’re never forced to place our content behind a paywall. We feel it’s crucial that 100% of our content remains free to everyone. We’re a tiny 501(c)3 public charity, entirely dependent upon the generosity of small donors. We have no endowment and no major donors. We run no advertisements and have no savings. We beg you to consider donating $4.00 per month. Thank you!
    —Jeff Ostrowski

Quick Thoughts

    Pope Pius XII Hymnal?
    Have you ever heard of the Pope Pius XII Hymnal? It’s a real book, published in the United States in 1959. Here’s a sample page so you can verify with your own eyes it existed.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    “Hybrid” Chant Notation?
    Over the years, many have tried to ‘simplify’ plainsong notation. The O’Fallon Propers attempted to simplify the notation—but ended up making matters worse. Dr. Karl Weinmann tried to do the same in the time of Pope Saint Pius X by replacing each porrectus. You can examine a specimen from his edition and see whether you agree he complicated matters. In particular, look at what he did with éxsules fílii Hévae.
    —Corpus Christi Watershed
    Antiphons Don’t Match?
    A reader wants to know why the Entrance and Communion antiphons in certain publications deviate from what’s prescribed by the GRADUALE ROMANUM published after Vatican II. Click here to read our answer. The short answer is: the Adalbert Propers were never intended to be sung. They were intended for private Masses only (or Masses without music). The “Graduale Parvum,” published by the John Henry Newman Institute of Liturgical Music in 2023, mostly uses the Adalbert Propers—but sometimes uses the GRADUALE text: e.g. Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul (29 June).
    —Corpus Christi Watershed

Random Quote

“Who dreamed on that day that within a few years, far less than a decade, the Latin past of the Church would be all but expunged, that it would be reduced to a memory fading into the middle distance? The thought of it would have horrified us, but it seemed so far beyond the realm of the possible as to be ridiculous. So we laughed it off.”

— Archbishop Dwyer of Portland (26-Oct-1973)

Recent Posts

  • Now Available! • “Hymns of Cardinal Newman: Kevin Allen’s Legendary Choral Settings”
  • Bugnini’s Statement (6 November 1966)
  • (Rehearsal Clips) • Sacred Music Symposium 2025
  • Hidden Gem: Ascendit Deus (Dalitz)
  • PDF Download • Soprano Descant — “Hail, Holy Queen Enthroned Above”

Subscribe

Subscribe

* indicates required

Copyright © 2025 Corpus Christi Watershed · Isaac Jogues on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Corpus Christi Watershed is a 501(c)3 public charity dedicated to exploring and embodying as our calling the relationship of religion, culture, and the arts. This non-profit organization employs the creative media in service of theology, the Church, and Christian culture for the enrichment and enjoyment of the public.

The election of Pope Leo XIV has been exciting, and we’re filled with hope for our apostolate’s future!

But we’re under pressure to transfer our website to a “subscription model.”

We don’t want to do that. We believe our website should remain free to all.

Our president has written the following letter:

President’s Message (dated 30 May 2025)

Are you able to support us?

clock.png

Time's up