About this blogger:
A theorist, organist, and conductor, Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004), and did graduate work in Musicology. He serves as choirmaster for the new FSSP parish in Los Angeles, where he resides with his wife and children.
Connect on Facebook:
Connect on Twitter:
“The problem of the new Missal resides in its departure from the continuous history which was going on before and after Pius V, and that it creates definitely a new book (although with old material). Its appearance is accompanied by a type of prohibition of what was traditional, being such a type of prohibition alien to the ecclesiastical history of law and of liturgy. From my personal knowledge of the conciliar debates and from the repeated reading of the speeches of the Fathers of the Council, I can say with certainty, that this was not intended by them.”
— Cardinal Ratzinger, Letter to Wolfgang Waldstein (14 December 1976)
Editio Vaticana Errata
published 7 November 2010 by Jeff Ostrowski

As great as the Editio Vaticana is, it is not perfect in every detail.

Joseph Gogniat points out that the Vatican Edition sometimes fails to mark each liquescent:

Here is another instance where liquescents are missing:

N.B. This example was taken from Cantus Selecti, which is not (strictly speaking) part of the Vatican Edition.