About this blogger:
A theorist, organist, and conductor, Jeff Ostrowski holds his B.M. in Music Theory from the University of Kansas (2004), and did graduate work in Musicology. He serves as choirmaster for the new FSSP parish in Los Angeles, where he resides with his wife and children.
Connect on Facebook:
Connect on Twitter:
“We must say it plainly: the Roman rite as we knew it exists no more. It has gone. Some walls of the structure have fallen, others have been altered—we can look at it as a ruin or as the partial foundation of a new building. Think back, if you remember it, to the Latin sung High Mass with Gregorian chant. Compare it with the modern post-Vatican II Mass. It is not only the words, but also the tunes and even certain actions that are different. In fact it is a different liturgy of the Mass.”
— Fr. Joseph Gelineau (1978)
Rev. Bewerunge Attacks Pothier
published 23 November 2010 by Jeff Ostrowski

If you enjoyed reading Dr. Peter Wagner’s defense of the Vatican Edition, you need to read Bewerunge’s article (below). Rev. Henry Bewerunge was a choir director and organist (who, incidentally, loved to accompany Gregorian chant). Here is a sample:

The Sanctus of this Mass is not found anywhere. It seems to be Dom Pothier’s own composition. The same holds of the Sanctus No. III, and the Agnus No. II, of the Cantus ad libitum. Now there is not, of course, any objection to Dom Pothier or anybody else composing new pieces of Church music, and if they select to write in the style of the Gregorian music, they are at perfect liberty to do so. But I certainly think that such compositions ought to have no place in the Vatican edition, which purports to be a collection of medieval music.

If you appreciate articles like these being made available, please consider supporting Corpus Christi Watershed by purchasing copies of this this brand new publication.

N.B. I recommend hitting the “full screen” button when viewing this article. How does this work?

Rev. Henry Bewerunge Attacks Pothier